But uniform title has been used for lots of things other than title
of the work, exactly. Especially by music catalogers. Either those
uses are going to be left un-filled by RDA or these catalogers are
going to continue using the title of work to do things that aren't
about naming the
If any of you have input into PCC standards, please try to get a
revision to the PCC report on provider neutral records for remote
electronic monographs.
The suggested SMD online resource should be changed to electronic
text; online resource is too general; it could be a game, or a
program.
At
Hal Cain said:
Just what is the uniform title intended to do here? To serve as a
one-line identifier for what's being catalogued; to provide a linking
point for the work content; or to provide a linking point for the
expression embodied?
Unform titles were a great filing aid in card
According to the FRBR-RDA Mapping (5JSC/RDA/FRBR to RDA mapping/Rev), there is
no attribute in RDA that corresponds to the FRBR attribute Title of the
expression (FRBR 4.3.1). Presumably, this is because RDA continues the
Anglo-American tradition of identifying expressions by means of
RDA has both authorized access point for work and authorized access point
for expression. There are no rules at present for authorized access
points for specific manifestations or items.
Adam
^^
Adam L. Schiff
Principal Cataloger
University of Washington
Adam, that's odd, because the RDA list of elements says title proper is
in the manifestation group.
kc
Adam L. Schiff wrote:
RDA has both authorized access point for work and authorized access
point for expression. There are no rules at present for authorized
access points for specific
It is my understanding that the AACR2 concept of “uniform title” has no direct
equivalent in RDA. In AACR2, a uniform title includes not only the title that
is used as the basis of the uniform title but also any addition made to it to
make a heading unique (e.g., a date, a qualifier like
In the case of multi-part monographs, LCNAF has cases of authorized
access points for what I take to be manifestation-level entities, e.g.
Tolkien, J. R. R. (John Ronald Reuel), 1892-1973. Lord of the rings
(Silver anniversary edition) [LCCN n 42024986]
which is a controlled heading for a
The “parts” making up a uniform title in AACR2 (e.g., basic title, additions,
subdivisions) have been defined in RDA as separate elements (Preferred title
for the work, Date of work, Other distinguishing characteristic of the work,
Content type, Language of expression, etc.). In these
Excellent! Good job, RDA. :) I think what Daniel describes makes sense.
Paradis Daniel wrote:
The “parts” making up a uniform title in AACR2 (e.g., basic title, additions,
subdivisions) have been defined in RDA as separate elements (Preferred title
for the work, Date of work, Other
Karen Coyle said:
RDA doesn't define a uniform title, but instead (well, I think of it
as instead) has title of the work.
It seems to me preferred title is the RDA core element which is most
like uniform title in AACR2. Except that it applies only to
distinctive uniform titles. What about
Mac said:
It seems to me preferred title is the RDA core element which is most
like uniform title in AACR2. Except that it applies only to
distinctive uniform titles. What about classical music form uniform
titles (the only 240s our clients like), and voluminous author form
uniform titles such
My recent LITA article is now available at the UC eScholarship Repository.
SUGGESTED CITATION:
Martha M. Yee, Can Bibliographic Data Be Put Directly Onto the
Semantic Web? (2009). Information Technology and Libraries. 28 (2),
pp. 55-80. Postprint available free at:
13 matches
Mail list logo
