Re: [RDA-L] Fw: What Goes into the 1xx Field?

2012-08-23 Thread Bernadette Mary O'Reilly
I don't have any problems with the 19.2.1.1.1 list, since RDA clearly identifies corporate bodies with these roles as creators. Just surprised to find that we'll be entering in 1XX some entities which RDA does not identify as creators, and thinking that people who don't have a lot of time to read

Re: [RDA-L] Fw: What Goes into the 1xx Field?

2012-08-23 Thread Kevin M Randall
Bernadette O'Reilly wrote: I don't have any problems with the 19.2.1.1.1 list, since RDA clearly identifies corporate bodies with these roles as creators. Just surprised to find that we'll be entering in 1XX some entities which RDA does not identify as creators, and thinking that people who

Re: [RDA-L] JSC, ISBD, and ISSN: harmonization discussions

2012-08-23 Thread James Weinheimer
On 22/08/2012 23:46, Kevin M Randall wrote: snip But until we do have some mechanism for dynamically keeping descriptions current, the notes that you say are completely useless are absolutely essential. I certainly agree with you that the traditional methods of creating metadata are not

Re: [RDA-L] JSC, ISBD, and ISSN: harmonization discussions

2012-08-23 Thread Karen Coyle
On 8/23/12 10:43 AM, James Weinheimer wrote: Still the basic idea still is worth a try (I think), where embedded metadata would be linked to separate metadata records in catalogs and spiders would keep the two in sync. I believe the technology is called microformats,[1] with the primary one

Re: [RDA-L] JSC, ISBD, and ISSN: harmonization discussions

2012-08-23 Thread James Weinheimer
On 23/08/2012 22:55, Karen Coyle wrote: snip On 8/23/12 10:43 AM, James Weinheimer wrote: Still the basic idea still is worth a try (I think), where embedded metadata would be linked to separate metadata records in catalogs and spiders would keep the two in sync. I believe the technology is

[RDA-L] ALCTS/LITA Metadata Standards Committee

2012-08-23 Thread Simpson, Betsy
The Association for Library Collections Technical Services (ALCTS) and the Library Information Technology Association (LITA), with the support of Reference and User Services Association (RUSA), divisions of the American Library Association, are pleased to announce the formation of the

Re: [RDA-L] New ISBNs and old dates

2012-08-23 Thread Gene Fieg
And that is what the LCRI has stated for years. On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:44 AM, J. McRee Elrod m...@slc.bc.ca wrote: Bernadette said: Publishers are required to assign new ISBNs to resources whenever their cover changes, and in most cases (except for the first paperback corresponding to a