John Hostage said:
The problem of place names is one that has been recognized by the
American Library Association as one that needs major revision ...
If RDA is to have major revision, perhaps implementation should wait
for that revision? Then there is the matter of a new coding schema,
which
Je serai absent(e) à partir du 31/12/2012 de retour le 02/01/2013.
Je répondrai à votre message dès mon retour.
Ce message électronique et les éventuels fichiers attachés sont transmis à
John Hostage wrote:
It's fortunate that there is now a German representative on the Joint Steering
Committee. There are a number of provisions in RDA that were carried over from
AACR2 because there wasn't time to reconsider them fully in an international
context.
Yes, we're very glad to
Mac,
I agree with many of your observations, e.g. that in practice it doesn't
make much difference whether a corporate body gets main or added entry.
Users probably won't even notice it.
Still, I don't think we can simply ignore the relevant RDA rules and
stick to our tradition. Because if
4 matches
Mail list logo
