Thanks, Sean. That tends to confirm my suggestion yesterday that the
reason why list I.3 lacks relators for contributors to a compilation is
that it is assumed that if they merit anything they can have a
name-title.
However, the fact remains that a lot of resources either list
contributors
First, Kelley's original question was about what the correct Media Type should
be for streaming video according to the instructions in RDA.
In RDA, there is a relationship between Media Type and Carrier Type. The list
of Carrier Types in 3.3.1.3 is divided into groups with captions that refer
Forgive the rant and ignorance of one stuck in the one dimensional 300 field.
I've not clearly understood the concept of the three part construct of content,
media, carrier let alone its finer delineations and declensions. Two
dimensional moving image which leaves out sound is perhaps no worse
Multiple creators and aggregate works are covered in RDA 19.1.2:
If the resource being described contains two or more works associated with
different persons, families, or corporate bodies, record the persons, families,
and corporate bodies associated with each of the works in the aggregate
The scope note for two dimensional moving image includes sound.
From RDA 6.9.1.3 for two dimensional moving image:
Moving images may or may not be accompanied by sound ...
Details about sound are covered in the Sound Content element (RDA 7.18).
'Sound content' is the presence of sound in a
Jack Wu said:
Two dimensional moving image which leaves out sound ...
Jack, I empathize with your reaction to RDA media terms, and share
your frustration. But one does not have to leave out sound. Media
terms are repeating, either in repeating $a or repeating fields.
(Most prefer repeating
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod
Sent: February-26-13 1:29 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Media type for streaming video
Jack Wu
I just want to double check that this is the appopriate place to report any
errors we find in the RDA toolkit:
http://www.rdatoolkit.org/support/open.php?
The dropdown box Help topic does not seem to have an option for Report
error or something similar.
--Ben
Benjamin Abrahamse
Cataloging
Hi Ben,
Yes, you can report errors by using that form. Select Content related.
You can also send an email to me (jscsecret...@rdatoolkit.org).
Judy Kuhagen
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Benjamin A Abrahamse babra...@mit.eduwrote:
I just want to double check that this is the appopriate
Hello Ben,
Yes, you may use the support ticket system to report errors in RDA
Toolkit.
Errors relating to RDA Toolkit will be addressed by us here at ALA
Digital Reference. Errors related to RDA text will be passed along to
the JSC for review.
Jamie
James Hennelly
Managing
John,
Thanks for pointing to that RDA/ONIX Framework. I wasn't aware of it. This does
put a lot of the content, carrier, media type terms in context.
--
Sean Chen sc...@law.duke.edu
Digital Resources Librarian
J. Michael Goodson Law Library
Duke University School of Law
(919)613-7028
On
MARC recently added $2isbdmeda as a source code, allow the use of
electronic rather than computer as a media term.
MARC also added $2isbdcontent as a source code. You might like to
take a look at ISBD Area 0 content terms. They are shoter, easier to
understand, and better for display, than the
Am 27.02.2013 07:49, schrieb J. McRee Elrod:
MARC recently added $2isbdmeda as a source code, allow the use of
electronic rather than computer as a media term.
MARC also added $2isbdcontent as a source code. You might like to
take a look at ISBD Area 0 content terms. They are shoter, easier
13 matches
Mail list logo
