Well, I thought I would go back to 2.4.1.4 and see what it says.
It appears to be very much in line with AACR2. I did not see anything like
the examples given in previous e-mails. Titles are omitted. They don't
really add anything to the area of responsibility. I did see Professors
used once,
The examples under Optional Omission are:
by Harry Smith
Source of information reads: by Dr. Harry Smith
Charles F. Hoban, Jr.
Source of information reads: Charles F. Hoban, Jr., Special Assistant, Division
of Visual Education, Philadelphia Public Schools
sponsored by the Library Association
Gene,
I wish it were so.
But 2.4.1.4 states, Transcribe a statement of responsibility in the form in
which it appears on the source of information. Immediately followed by the
optional omission, Abridge a statement of responsibility only if it can be
abridged without loss of essential
While the RDA creator element can be mapped to the MARC 1XX field, this
mapping breaks down for works involving more than one creator, since the 1XX
field is not repeatable. At present, subsequent creators are mapped to MARC
7XX, which is also used for contributors, so they can only be
All of this information on persons' affiliations could be recorded in our
authority records -- is it really necessary to repeat it all in our
bibliographic records as
well?
I got an impression that one day data represented in authority records
could be viewed or searched in end-users' clients.
Blah is right! MARC has served us very well for many decades. Through
heroic life support means, we've been able to keep it functioning well beyond
its original intended purpose, but there are natural limitations that are going
to end up being fatal.
Kevin
From: Resource Description and
That, again, is why adding the relationship designators are so important;
even if they have to be at the highest levels, e.g., Creator. But we
definitely do need a better high level designator than Other Persons,
Families, or Corporate Bodies Associated with a Work
- - - - - - - -
On 3/12/2013 9:07 AM, Benjamin A Abrahamse babra...@mit.edu wrote:
But 2.4.1.4 states, Transcribe a statement of responsibility in the
form in which it appears on the source of information. Immediately
followed by the optional omission, Abridge a statement of
responsibility only if it can be
It may not be the same as AACR2 but it has the same gist (gyst?): don't
include any unnecesary verbiage that does not add to the reponsible agent.
This would include personal names that have forename and surname. When
surname is only available and a title is present, use it.
When corporate
Pam Withrow withr...@perma-bound.com wrote:
Playaway Audio
336 - spoken word
337 - audio
338 - audio cartridge
In my opinion:
336 -- spoken word
337 -- audio
338 -- other
A Playaway Audio doesn't quite fit under the definition of an audio
cartridge (a cartridge containing audio tape).
--
Thank you for your opinion. I agree that audio cartridge is not a good
fit. It looks like we will continue to hash this one out.
--Pam
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 3:16 PM, M. E. m.k.e.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Pam Withrow withr...@perma-bound.com wrote:
Playaway Audio
336 - spoken word
337 -
In my opinion a Playaway is unmediated. You don't need anything other than the
object itself (and a source of electricity) to get the information, in contrast
to, say, a CD, which you need to put in a machine in order to use. Media type
is a categorization reflecting the general type of
Mark said:
In my opinion:
336 -- spoken word
337 -- audio
338 -- other
A Playaway Audio doesn't quite fit under the definition of an audio
cartridge (a cartridge containing audio tape).
I agree with Mark, but did not comment on this originally because of
the uselessness of other. The MRIs have
Michael Chopey cho...@hawaii.edu wrote:
I don't know where the instruction for preceding the $e with a comma is to
be found, nor the instruction not to include the comma when the field
preceding the $e ends with a hyphen.
The closest I ever got: A comma is used ... to separate date, number,
Thank you, Bob. That is an excellent point. I never would have thought of
it that way.
--Pam
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Robert Maxwell robert_maxw...@byu.eduwrote:
In my opinion a Playaway is unmediated. You don’t need anything other
than the object itself (and a source of
Yes, other leaves a lot to the imagination!
--Pam
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 4:35 PM, J. McRee Elrod m...@slc.bc.ca wrote:
Mark said:
In my opinion:
336 -- spoken word
337 -- audio
338 -- other
A Playaway Audio doesn't quite fit under the definition of an audio
cartridge (a cartridge
Robert Maxwell robert_maxw...@byu.edu wrote:
In my opinion a Playaway is unmediated. You don’t need anything other
than the object itself (and a source of electricity) to get the
information, in contrast to, say, a CD, which you need to put in a machine
in order to use.
Good point. I
For preceding the $e with a comma, see the LC PCC PS for 1.7.1 Access Points
in Name Authority and Bibliographic Records (General)
http://access.rdatoolkit.org/document.php?id=lcpschp1
http://access.rdatoolkit.org/document.php?id=lcpschp1target=lcps1-223#lcps
1-223 target=lcps1-223#lcps1-223
Deborah Fritz debo...@marcofquality.com wrote:
For preceding the $e with a comma, see the LC PCC PS for 1.7.1 Access
Points in Name Authority and Bibliographic Records (General)
http://access.rdatoolkit.org/document.php?id=lcpschp1target=lcps1-223#lcps1-223
** **
1.
19 matches
Mail list logo
