I'm not quite sure if I'm talking about exactly the same issue, but this is
something that is worrying me:
(Also, I do apologise to be mentioning a MARC subfield, which I don't think
purists like, but it's useful shorthand; also not to give the RDA rule number,
but I don't have access to the
Dear RDA-Lers,
On Friday my colleague loaded the new authority records for all of the New
Testament headings. When we looked at our Millennium catalog this morning,
all the headings had flipped. However bib records with 730s such as Bible.
N.T. Acts. English aren't affected by the new authority
If your system can export and import a file of MARC records of interest, the
program you find here may be of use. This is for all of the phase 2 changes,
not just the Bible.
http://files.library.northwestern.edu/public/RdaConversion
Start with the documentation, whose name
Am 25.03.2013 13:30, schrieb Paul Davey:
... I do apologise to be
mentioning a MARC subfield, which I don't think purists like, but
it's useful shorthand; also not to give the RDA rule number, but I
don't have access to the Toolkit, but I'm sure readers will know what
I mean)
... no access to
How delightful. I find we have a little puddle also...
All of the bib records that I have checked so far have a previous entry for
Bible.|p Acts. that was properly flipped. I wonder if they weren't busied
still when the time came to flip the headings that didn't get flipped. (We
have good 130s
Thank you for your responses!
I guess I'm a little grumpy today, but ...
Does anyone have any idea which algorithm or workflow was used to create
the authority record loads we're getting? I truly do not understand why the
authority records for the federal government cabinet departments are
The conversion program was told to examine records in LC's copy of the LC/NACO
Authority File in sequential order, from first to last.
Gary L. Strawn, Authorities Librarian, etc.
Northwestern University Library, 1970 Campus Drive, Evanston IL 60208-2300
e-mail: mrsm...@northwestern.edu voice:
Paul,
RDA is actually quite clear on this matter. In this case (unlike the one
I was talking about), it's not a complete element which is supplied, but
only a part of it.
The basic rule for this can also be found in 1.4 (Language and script):
When adding data within an element listed above,
I just checked ours. The authority records for Bible have been loaded, but
none of the entries were changed, either subject or title (130 and 730)
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Adger Williams awilli...@colgate.eduwrote:
How delightful. I find we have a little puddle also...
All of the
Note that RDA 0.11.2 has general information about language and script.
Judy Kuhagen
JSC Secretary
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Heidrun Wiesenmüller
wiesenmuel...@hdm-stuttgart.de wrote:
Paul,
RDA is actually quite clear on this matter. In this case (unlike the one I
was talking
Paul Davey asked:
If I am creating a 245$c and I want to make use of the option that =
allows abbreviation to and twelve others what is the appropriate way
of expressing that?
[and 12 others], i.e., the language of the catalogue, in contrast
to the [by], [par] etc. we used to supply prior to
I'm aware of 0.11.2, but I'm not sure how it relates to the [and twelve
others] question.
True, under RDA an agency can choose its preferred language, and this
doesn't have to be English. So, Paul's library could choose e.g. Finnish
as the language of the catalog. But if I read RDA correctly,
Two announcements have been posted on the JSC public web site:
-- RDA Training Materials from JSC Constituencies (information from
Australia, Canada, and the United States; information from Germany and the
United Kingdom to be added later)
-- New JSC members (Christine Frodl, Kevin Marsh, and
13 matches
Mail list logo
