Just a note here: 504 is not a quoted note, but one that is constructed:
Includes bibliographical references ()
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Dana Van Meter vanme...@ias.edu wrote:
Thanks everyone. I did see rule 1.7.1 at some point in my RDA travels,
and then forgot about it. I agree
I don't see how LC PCC PS 1.71. applies to this. The one example given
simply gives the pages. The past practice would indicate that those page
numbers are actually printed in the item. If not, then the pages not
numbered would be put in brackets, so that if p. 310 were not printed the
note
LC PCC PS 1.7.1 is a guideline for all notes, including a 504. As you say, 504
does not contain quoted data. Since the instruction for square brackets says
they are to be used only in the case of quoted data, they should not be used
for the case of unprinted page numbers. This is a departure
On Saturday, April 13, 2013 9:50 PM, Jacqueline Byrd wrote:
So, would we just ignore CIP information that would normally go in a
transcription field? It's not unusual for me to find an edition and/or series
statement only in the CIP. Is it best not to record information for these
fields if it
So, would we just ignore CIP information that would normally go in a
transcription field?
In most cases, the CIP information is in the LC or LAC record which
was upgraded from a CIP one. We would not remove nor bracket that
information; it is in the item.
Of course one must be aware of earlier
5 matches
Mail list logo
