JSC Secretary wrote:
The last paragraph of 2.4.2.3 says:
If not all statements of responsibility appearing on the source or
sources of information are being recorded, give preference to those
identifying creators of the intellectual or artistic content. In case
of doubt, record the first
I think you are right. The last option in RDA is a melding of AACR2 and
RDA.
The original omission of Dr., for instance, had to do with the fact that
the title did not add very much to essence of the area of responsibility
(essence is a word may not be quite the correct word here).
On Fri, May
Mac Elrod wrote:
The major change is that we now may include data formerly omitted, but
as with much in RDA, options abound. When in doubt, I suggest
including, apart from affiliations. There is a field in the authority
record for affiliations; they don't have to be in each bibliographic
Heidrun said:
I've been wondering: Which statement would be core in the case of an
edited collection, when you have one statement naming the editors and
another one naming the people who have contributed?
SLC preferes to record the editors in 245/$c, but the contributing
authors in 505 and
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod
Sent: May-11-13 2:01 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Abridging statement of responsibility
Heidrun
Thomas,
It's probably even less complicated than that.
The name of the specific RDA element under discussion is Statement of
responsibility relating to title proper which means a statement listing authors for
separately titled pieces within the resource is not likely related to the title
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Heidrun
Wiesenmüller
Sent: May-11-13 4:31 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Abridging statement of responsibility
heidrun answered Thomas:
[Title proper of the resource]
Edited by A and B
With contributions by C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K
In my opinion there are two instances here of the element statement
of responsibility relating to title proper, whereas you seem to
think that only the first one belongs
8 matches
Mail list logo
