Beth asked:
Can a MARC record which does not contain =E2=80=9Call the core
elements that are applicable and readily ascertainable=E2=80=9D
(0.6.1) but in all other ways follows RDA guidelines be coded as an
RDA record (008/18 i and 040 $e rda).
Yes, it should be coded i (ISBD punctuationn is
Beth,
I cannot help with the MARC coding, but I can try and explain 0.6.1:
My colleagues and I are confused by the two subpoints (a and b)
outlined in 0.6.1 which refer to choosing to apply various levels of
description and/or detail. Do those options only apply when including
“other
Gary,
The rules which you need can be found in 1.9.2 (Supplied date). Under
1.9.2.4 (Probable range of years) there are examples like this:
[between 1800 and 1899?]
[between 1400 and 1600?]
In 2.8.6.6, there is a reference to 1.9.2.
Heidrun
On 13.08.2013 21:19, Gary Oliver wrote:
I have
In a collaboration such as this, it is important to know the actual layout
of the title page. Could you scan and attach, or replicate it as closely as
possible?
Without seeing the layout and actual wording, I would say:
- both Tony and Jill should be added as Creators (19.2.1.1)
Gary,
If supplying a date per 1.9.2 is not possible, then you can apply the 2nd
paragraph of 2.8.6.6:
If an approximate date of publication for a single-part resource cannot
reasonably be determined, record *date of publication not identified*.
Indicate that the information was taken from a
Anne Laguna said:
Greetings from sunny Townsville
I have a picture book called 'Bombo the wonder dog' .
I've little to add to Ms Fritz's analysis, except to emphasize that if
pictures predominate over text, the main entry (to stick with known
terminology) should be the artist, and if text, the
Gary Oliver said:
I am able to assume a century.
We continue the AACR2 [18--] as opposed to [date of publication not
identified]. We will never use that phrase (AACR2 wisely did not
allow [nd]). We know it was not published in 2014, which the patron
would not know in 2014; I know of no ILS
Like many libraries, we have an approval plan set up through YBP where we get
LC records through OCLC PromptCat for materials. With some of the new
materials, we are getting full RDA records (all have $e rda in the 040),
generated by LC, but there is no relationship designator ($e) in the 100
*Head, Resource Description and Metadata Services (FA391z)*
*George Mason University Libraries*
The George Mason University Libraries is seeking a creative and experienced
librarian for the position of Head, Resource Description and Metadata
Services. This department head position provides
Luckily I have kept this string ... still on the subject, I'm looking at a
monograph (on scrapbooking) that includes as much image content as text, and
lots of them are actually patterns.
So, two 336s (text and still image), but what does everyone do now re. patterns?
Karen
From: Resource
I find it really difficult to understand what is meant by some of the
terms for the various kinds of illustrations in 7.15 (in German
cataloging, we only distinguish four kinds of illustrations). The German
RDA translation isn't much help either.
So, could anybody help with my questions?
1.
I believe so. LC practice (as distinguished from PCC practice) is to require
RDs only for illustrators of children's books, although that doesn't mean LC
catalogers cannot make individual decisions to add RDs in other categories. And
I see the PCC guidelines more as best practice rather than
I can't offer much help in situations 1.-3., but I do catalog a lot of
brochures for one of our special collections devoted to color-- sales
catalogs for paint and fabrics, where the paint chip and fabric samples need
to be distinguished from the period illustrations that are also featured (at
I'm just as mystified as you are. The RDA glossary gives 2 definitions of
chart, but both are better suited for a stand-alone resource than for
illustrative content. I don't know what the difference between charts and
graphs is supposed to be. What Wikipedia calls chart-like diagrams are
The following lists core elements for RDA and Library of Congress.
Primary relationships
- Only the predominant or first-named work manifested is required, if
more than one work is embodied in the manifestation.
- Only the predominant or first-named expression manifested is required,
Heidrun asked:
I find it really difficult to understand what is meant by some of the
terms for the various kinds of illustrations ...
I don't pretend to understand RDA's use of words, but this is how I'm
asking SLC cataloguers to use them.
1. charts vs. graphs:
Graphs usually compare
In answering Heidrun:
I find it really difficult to understand what is meant by some of the
terms for the various kinds of illustrations ...
I neglected to mention samples.
Steven got it right I think. While paint chips may be the most
common, fabric swatches also happen (e.g., clan
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, Heidrun Wiesenmüller wrote:
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 20:47:03 +0200
From: Heidrun Wiesenmüller wiesenmuel...@hdm-stuttgart.de
Reply-To: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject:
18 matches
Mail list logo
