Re: [RDA-L] ] The "A" in RDA

2013-07-29 Thread JSC Chair
fit RDA well, in my opinion or not?. > > Wojciech Siemaszkiewicz > > > On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 9:58 AM, James Weinheimer < > weinheimer.ji...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 26/07/2013 22:10, JSC Chair wrote: >> >> >> Taking the bigger view is pr

Re: [RDA-L] ] The "A" in RDA

2013-07-29 Thread JSC Chair
=combobulation > > Meaning # 2 seems to fit RDA well, in my opinion or not?. > > Wojciech Siemaszkiewicz > > > On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 9:58 AM, James Weinheimer < > weinheimer.ji...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 26/07/2013 22:10, JSC Chair wrote: >> >&g

[RDA-L] Reminders to the RDA-L

2013-07-29 Thread JSC Chair
f you not represented by a JSC constituency, you are always welcome to send proposals to the JSC Chair (for now through the end of December, that is me!) at jscch...@rdatoolkit.org - Barbara -- Dr. Barbara B. Tillett, Ph.D. Chair, Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA

Re: [RDA-L] ] The "A" in RDA

2013-07-29 Thread JSC Chair
AC.GC.CA] *On Behalf Of *James Weinheimer > *Sent:* 27 July 2013 14:59 > *To:* RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA > *Subject:* Re: [RDA-L] ] The "A" in RDA > > ** ** > > On 26/07/2013 22:10, JSC Chair wrote: > > > Taking the bigger view is precisely

Re: [RDA-L] 338 field for a "volume" of art prints

2013-07-26 Thread JSC Chair
b page for the list of the JSC representatives ( http://www.rda-jsc.org/members.html ). If your country is not represented on the JSC, you are always welcome to write directly to the JSC Chair (for now that is me) at jscch...@rdatoolkit.org . This applies to any suggestion you may have for improvements

Re: [RDA-L] ] The "A" in RDA

2013-07-26 Thread JSC Chair
catalog to re-use of bibliographic data in the broader information community - to enable libraries to interact better in that larger realm where our users are - to connect users to the rich resources and related resources we have to offer and beyond. - Barbara Tillett JSC Chair On Fri, Jul 26,

Re: [RDA-L] RDA data entry form

2013-07-25 Thread JSC Chair
Great to hear your progress! Any chance of having a version that runs on my MAC? I also have a PC so can do what you suggested, but I'd love to be able to use the screen shots in the upcoming workshop I'm doing in Japan in September - Steve and I will be there for 2 months (Sept-Oct). Can't wai

Re: [RDA-L] Help with relationship designator

2013-05-28 Thread JSC Chair
Suggestions for additional terms are always welcome. - Barbara Tillett, JSC Chair On Tuesday, May 28, 2013, J. McRee Elrod wrote: > Dana Van Meter said: > > >Not having a fuller list of terms in RDA is really a failing of RDA > > Not to mention not haviving them in one alphabet

Re: [RDA-L] Help with relationship designator

2013-05-28 Thread JSC Chair
They are not core in RDA. Required elements are clearly indicated as core when you look at the RDA instructions. For PCC policies, I suggest you use the PCC list. - Barbara Tillett, JSC Chair On Tuesday, May 28, 2013, Gene Fieg wrote: > > Are relationship designators required? > > &

Re: [RDA-L] Bibframe

2013-05-28 Thread JSC Chair
ra Tillett, JSC Chair On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Joseph, Angelina < angelina.jos...@marquette.edu> wrote: > Every now and then I see the word “Bibframe” in emails. Is it replacing > MARC? How is that going to be? > > ** ** > > *-- angelina* > > Angelina J

Re: [RDA-L] Statement of responsibility naming more than three persons etc.

2013-02-06 Thread JSC Chair
You can do exactly what you suggested with RDA. - Barbara Tillett On Wednesday, February 6, 2013, Heidrun Wiesenmüller wrote: > After all this talk about German cataloging, I suppose it's time to get > back to RDA ;-) > > The other day we discussed the optional omission for statements of > respo

Re: [RDA-L] RDA dtst t + a 260/264 muse on training question

2013-01-31 Thread JSC Chair
e the standard phrase 'date of publication not identified'. - Barbara Tillett, JSC Chair Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Benjamin A Abrahamse wrote: > I'm curious if people who oppose the use of "t" (pub date/cop

Re: [RDA-L] Color: an attribute at the manifestation or content level?

2013-01-18 Thread JSC Chair
I disagree with Mr. Arakawa. Color does apply to illustrations in RDA. The instruction at 7.15.1.3 specifically deals with illustrations, and 7.17.1.3 goes on to the color aspect of content - with the examples at 7.17.1.3 also reinforcing that the instruction applies to illustrations as a type of

Re: [RDA-L] Color: an attribute at the manifestation or content level?

2013-01-18 Thread JSC Chair
Your question points out an interesting discrepancy in RDA that was carried over from AACR2 (2.17B1) and should be re-examined with regard to Early Printed Resources, where RDA 3.21.2 for item-specific carrier characteristics now includes notes about the "rubrication, illumination, and other hand-c