On 10/05/2013 00:21, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
snip
Festshrift codes, no. I didn't mean ALL of the data, indeed.
Format/genre/medium/carrier info? Such as in leader bytes 6-7, field
007, and now the 336/337/338? Absolutely.
I am not saying that ALL the info in the MARC record is equally
Please excuse the cross-posting.
I am doing local training for my library on RDA. I have often said that the
reason why we are moving to RDA is because this is now our national
standard. I have also said that part of the reason for moving to RDA is a
first step toward moving us into linked data
: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Julie Moore
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 3:20 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: [RDA-L] 336, 337, 338 and the post-MARC environment
Please excuse the cross-posting.
I am doing
:* Thursday, May 09, 2013 3:20 PM
*To:* RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
*Subject:* [RDA-L] 336, 337, 338 and the post-MARC environment
** **
Please excuse the cross-posting.
** **
I am doing local training for my library on RDA. I have often said that
the reason why we are moving to RDA
@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Gene Fieg
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 3:57 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] 336, 337, 338 and the post-MARC environment
And how are these field going to be displayed in an easily understandable
manner to the patron. Will we need
On 5/9/2013 3:56 PM, Gene Fieg wrote:
And how are these field going to be displayed in an easily
understandable manner to the patron. Will we need a priest of RDA near
the shoulder of every patron as she/he searches for that DVD she knows
is in the library somewhere, because the AACR2 catalog
On 09/05/2013 22:17, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
snip
On 5/9/2013 3:56 PM, Gene Fieg wrote:
And how are these field going to be displayed in an easily
understandable manner to the patron. Will we need a priest of RDA near
the shoulder of every patron as she/he searches for that DVD she knows
is
My software, and by extension, my users using my software, use the MARC
leader, 007, 008, 040, and other fixed/coded fields, every day. It is
not data that nobody uses or can use.
But that's your opinion, that it has been a mistake to have fixed fields
and coded fields in MARC from the
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] 336, 337, 338 and the post-MARC environment
On 09/05/2013 22:17, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
snip
On 5/9/2013 3:56 PM, Gene Fieg wrote:
And how are these field going to be displayed in an easily
understandable manner to the patron. Will we need a priest of RDA near
and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Gene Fieg
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 2:57 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] 336, 337, 338 and the post-MARC environment
And how are these field going to be displayed in an easily understandable
manner
On 09/05/2013 23:11, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
snip
My software, and by extension, my users using my software, use the
MARC leader, 007, 008, 040, and other fixed/coded fields, every day.
It is not data that nobody uses or can use.
But that's your opinion, that it has been a mistake to have
-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of James Weinheimer
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 4:33 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] 336, 337, 338 and the post-MARC environment
On 09/05/2013 23:11, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
snip
My software, and by extension, my users using my software, use the MARC leader
, 2013 2:57 PM
*To:* RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
*Subject:* Re: [RDA-L] 336, 337, 338 and the post-MARC environment
** **
And how are these field going to be displayed in an easily understandable
manner to the patron. Will we need a priest of RDA near the shoulder of
every patron
Kevin said:
The new 336-338 fields follow in the decades-long tradition of coded data i=
n MARC ...
Then why not use language neutral codes, or user friendly terms
suitable for display?
I do realize that horse is long gone.
__ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca)
{__ | /
14 matches
Mail list logo