tion and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Brenndorfer, Thomas
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 10:14 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Extent -- some ideas
That separation of content and carrier is what makes sense. I
lf Of Joan Wang
[jw...@illinoisheartland.org]
Sent: August-21-13 9:55 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Extent -- some ideas
My initial thought is to separate carrier from content. Carrier types and
extent of carrier should be defined irrelevant of content. A sheet is a sheet.
A volume is a vo
t; lcrei...@lib.nmsu.edu]
> Sent: August-20-13 5:45 PM
> To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
> Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Extent -- some ideas
>
> I am with you until, "The other benefit to treating Pagination as a
> separate element is that it's unique in that the measurement isn
Description and Access
[RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Laurence S. Creider
[lcrei...@lib.nmsu.edu]
Sent: August-20-13 5:45 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Extent -- some ideas
I am with you until, "The other benefit to treating Pagination as a
separate eleme
I am with you until, "The other benefit to treating Pagination as a
separate element is that it's unique in that the measurement isn't usually
based on the actual number of pages, but on the recording of the last
numbered page."
How would this be different from recording the complete sequences of
On the topic of improving the idea of "Extent," this discussion paper is on the
right track:
http://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/6JSC-ALA-Discussion-1.pdf
The main problem has its source in cramming too many overlapping ideas into the
300$a field. There are different things being counted.
Extent of Ex
6 matches
Mail list logo
