Sevim posted:
>
>538 Available online via OhioLINK's ETD Center
As said earlier, RDA's 264 2 $a[Columbus, Ohio] $bOhioLink EDT Center,
$c2012. seems a better solution. Or "ETD" could be spelled out.
For 538 we would have 538 $aMode of access: World Wide Web.
>710 2 OhioLINK Electronic These
Proposals for new designators may be made through the American Library
Association's representative to the Joint Steering Committee [for U.S.
libraries]. The Program for Cooperative Cataloging is asking its members
to submit proposals for new designators to the chair of the PCC Standing
Commit
Fortunately, it's not a closed list.
At the beginning of 18.5.1.3, RDA says: "Record one or more appropriate
terms from the list in appendix I (...) to indicate the nature of the
relationship more specifically than is indicated by the defined scope of
the relationship element itself."
But RD
In our rough draft of an ETD template in RDA, we have a note field that's
important to us,
538 Available online via OhioLINK's ETD Center
And a
710 2 OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center.
We'd like to use a relationship designator after the 710, but don't see one in
Appendix I.2
4 matches
Mail list logo
