-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Heidrun Wiesenmüller
Sent: January-08-13 3:02 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Separate bibliographic identities
Thomas
Thomas said:
Actually, I found it rather appealing to have name as a separate entity in FRAD (it
seemed to make the model much more flexible), until one of my students quite reasonably asked:
What about people with the same name, then? Do they share the same name entity?
This issue is
] Separate bibliographic identities
Thomas said:
Just a suggestion-- would not relationship designators serve as the data to
accomplish much of this. That is, without adding anything to existing
records, or deciding a priori that one entity is a super entity.
For example, the use
Mary,
When we worked on our discovery system, we did include 'see'
references and limited 'see also' references in the search. So
searching for Julie Andrews also retrieves children's books by Julie
Edwards (for example). We decided not to include 551's since we were
afraid it would
Dan Matei said:
This super entity would be useful. When I search for Bill Clinton, I would
like to get:
Bill Clinton (as himself): n1 entities;
Bill Clinton (as governor of Arkansas): n2 entities;
Bill Clinton (as president of USA): n3 entities.
Likewise: search for Frederic Dannay:
Ellery
I've found this discussion very interesting and can't stop myself from making a
comment. When we worked on our discovery system, we did include 'see'
references and limited 'see also' references in the search. So searching for
Julie Andrews also retrieves children's books by Julie Edwards (for
Thomas said:
Just a suggestion-- would not relationship designators serve as the data to accomplish
much of this. That is, without adding anything to existing records, or deciding a priori
that one entity is a super entity.
For example, the use of the relationship designators real
Referring to the concept of separate bibliographic identities, Laurence
said:
This concept is not part of the Anglo-American tradition, but it was
included in a revised edition of AACR2. In my opinion, it was an
ill-considered attempt to deal with the problem that some authors use
different
Heidrun said:
When I first learned about the AACR2 concept of separate bibliographic
identities, it did make sense to me, e.g. when thinking of Lewis Carroll
/ Charles Dodgson. Obviously, if someone was looking for things like the
Curiosa mathematica, they don't want to be drowned in editions
-Original Message-
From: Heidrun Wiesenmüller wiesenmuel...@hdm-stuttgart.de
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 13:24:23 +0100
If it is indeed necessary to distinguish between different
names/pseudonyms (of which I am not totally convinced), I think it would
have to be done in a different way. If
10 matches
Mail list logo
