[RDA-L] Title entries (Was: Editor as main entry)

2012-10-09 Thread James Weinheimer
On 08/10/2012 19:27, Adam L. Schiff wrote: snip Because the rule of three from AACR2 is gone, it doesn't matter how many creators there are for a work. In RDA the authorized access point for a work is the combination of the first named or prominently named creator and the preferred title for

Re: [RDA-L] Title entries (Was: Editor as main entry)

2012-10-09 Thread Paradis Daniel
://www.banq.qc.ca/ De : Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] De la part de James Weinheimer Envoyé : 9 octobre 2012 03:43 À : RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca Objet : [RDA-L] Title entries (Was: Editor as main

Re: [RDA-L] Title entries (Was: Editor as main entry)

2012-10-09 Thread James Weinheimer
On 09/10/2012 16:02, Paradis Daniel wrote: snip James Weinheimer wrote: Still, there is no reason for a single 1xx field any longer. Too bad that wasn't dropped instead of the rule of three... RDA is not concerned with encoding but rule 6.27.1.3 does give the alternative to Include in

Re: [RDA-L] Title entries

2012-10-09 Thread J. McRee Elrod
James said: Yes, and the problem with this (other than changing the rule of three to the rule of one and maintaining that it increases access--but that is another point) is that the 1xx field is not repeatable. If the four authors have equal responsibility, they should all be in the 100 field ...