On 08/10/2012 19:27, Adam L. Schiff wrote:
snip
Because the rule of three from AACR2 is gone, it doesn't matter how
many creators there are for a work. In RDA the authorized access
point for a work is the combination of the first named or prominently
named creator and the preferred title for
://www.banq.qc.ca/
De : Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] De la part de James Weinheimer
Envoyé : 9 octobre 2012 03:43
À : RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Objet : [RDA-L] Title entries (Was: Editor as main
On 09/10/2012 16:02, Paradis Daniel wrote:
snip
James Weinheimer wrote:
Still, there is no reason for a single 1xx field any longer. Too bad
that wasn't dropped instead of the rule of three...
RDA is not concerned with encoding but rule 6.27.1.3 does give the
alternative to Include in
James said:
Yes, and the problem with this (other than changing the rule of three to
the rule of one and maintaining that it increases access--but that is
another point) is that the 1xx field is not repeatable. If the four
authors have equal responsibility, they should all be in the 100 field ...
4 matches
Mail list logo