Sian Woolcock sian.woolc...@adelaide.edu.au wrote:
We are currently having a discussion about recording the number of
unnumbered plates in the extent field (MARC 300). The RDA toolkit has us
confused on this.
**
** **
Previously under AACR2 rules, if we had a book with unnumbered plates
Just a question here. Why did RDA get rid of the use brackets. The use of
brackets made the statement of physicality clear: those pages or
plates were not explicitly numbered. Why not continue using brackets for
the same purpose in RDA?
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 7:03 PM, M. E.
Hi there,
Firstly apologies if the question has been previously discussed.
We are currently having a discussion about recording the number of unnumbered
plates in the extent field (MARC 300). The RDA toolkit has us confused on this.
Previously under AACR2 rules, if we had a book with
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Sian Woolcock
[sian.woolc...@adelaide.edu.au]
Sent: August-20-13 8:45 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: [RDA-L] recording on unnumbered
Sian Woolcock posted:
300 - - a 202 pages, 16 pages of plates : b ill. ; c 21 cm.
I would suggest you stop agonizing over what RDA says, and record the
data your patrons would find useful. You can't be faulted for
exceeding core requirements.
Attempting to following the exact wording of RDA
5 matches
Mail list logo
