Kathie Goldfarb wrote:
Until the 3xx can format a GMD, it is our plan to add them manually. Luckily,
our library does not add a lot of media. Ebook bulk loads will need to be
edited, but hopefully, a way will be found to do that in bulk.
I have seen several libraries in different forums mention
Julie,
The RDA cutover date applies only to authority records. PCC libraries
may continue to describe resources after March 31 using AACR2, but any new
name authorities created for the LC/NACO Authority File must be formulated
according to RDA instructions.
Julie,
We have been doing Mac's option 1 (don't display 33x fields, do
generate an icon, based on fixed field values), and it seems quite
satisfactory. We're an Innovative library. The icons appear on browse
summary screens to the side of the record, and, on full-display in the top
right
news visit our blog: Library
Mattershttp://blogs.rgu.ac.uk/
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Adger Williams
Sent: 31 January 2013 12:40
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] GMD revisited
[mailto:awilli...@colgate.edu]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 7:40 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] GMD revisited
Julie,
We have been doing Mac's option 1 (don't display 33x fields, do generate an
icon, based on fixed field values), and it seems quite satisfactory
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Kathleen Lamantia
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 7:33 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] GMD revisited
We will do the same, and, we will add gmd back
and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] *On Behalf Of *Kathleen Lamantia
*Sent:* Thursday, January 31, 2013 7:33 AM
*To:* RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
*Subject:* Re: [RDA-L] GMD revisited
** **
We will do the same, and, we will add gmd back in manually to the 245|h.
I am not sure
While this is correct, it is notable that the Library of Congress is
switching all bibliographic work over to RDA on the same date.
Per Beacher Wiggins at the RDA Update Forum at ALA Midwinter this past
weekend: everything coming out of LoC will follow RDA (they will ensure
access points in copy
-BAC.GC.CA
*Subject:* Re: [RDA-L] GMD revisited
** **
Has anyone using Voyager decided to do this? That is, add back 245/ $h
gmd in the local system? I agree that the 336, 337, 338 don’t need to be
viewable which ours are not.
** **
Thanks.
** **
Carolyn Kadri
Special
Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Shana McDanold
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 12:01 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] GMD revisited
While this is correct, it is notable that the Library of Congress is switching
all bibliographic
@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] *On Behalf Of *Shana McDanold
*Sent:* Thursday, January 31, 2013 12:01 PM
*To:* RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
*Subject:* Re: [RDA-L] GMD revisited
** **
While this is correct, it is notable that the Library of Congress is
switching all bibliographic work over to RDA
In two of the three libraries where I volunteer, I have been instructed to
add the GMD back in. Apparently, at least from what I have been told, both
patrons and librarians like to know that something is, e.g., a movie or a
sound recording from looking at the record in the online catalog.
So far,
12 matches
Mail list logo
