20.08.2012 21:59, J. McRee Elrod:
Heidrun wisely said:
The ISBD has been a common core of many cataloguing codes for
decades. This common ground shouldn't be casually abandoned.
VERY true.
While not taking issue with the importance of ISBD as such, it
can, I think, not be called a common
Bernhard said:
While not taking issue with the importance of ISBD as such, it
can, I think, not be called a common core of cataloging codes
in general, but of those of their parts relating to description.
It is true that ISBD does not address access points. ISBD does
provide for the
I think that is the intention. It was brought up as an RDA change from AACR2 at
an early ALA pre-conference I attended. AACR2 1.1F12: Treat a noun phrase
occurring in conjunction with a statement of responsibility as other title
information if it is indicative of the nature of the work. RDA
If a noun or noun phrase occurs with a statement of responsibility, treat
the noun or noun phrase as part of the statement of responsibility.
I would consider that such a noun or noun phrase should be something
closely related to the statement of responsibility. That means that they
can not be
RDA-L readers,
The second example might have the other title information and statement of
responsibility data in more than one manner of presentation on a printed title
page.
If, as Benjamin Abrahamse has already given, it is presented on two lines:
Another Tome
a novel
by John Smith
The key phrase noted by Joan is they can not be separated semantically. I
would use this rule when the title page reads: arranged for organ by ...
Ralph
Ralph Hartsock
Senior Music Cataloger
University of North Texas Libraries
E-mail: ralph.harts...@unt.edumailto:ralph.harts...@unt.edu
From:
On 22/08/2012 08:56, Bernhard Eversberg wrote:
snip
20.08.2012 21:59, J. McRee Elrod:
Heidrun wisely said:
The ISBD has been a common core of many cataloguing codes for
decades. This common ground shouldn't be casually abandoned.
VERY true.
While not taking issue with the importance of
James Weinheimer wrote:
Notes such as Description based on web page (Dec. 23,
2008) are 100% completely useless for everyone involved, including the
catalogers, and serve only as salve for the cataloger at the time of making
the record. The description should be based on the resource as it
Autocaters:
In preparing RDA procedures for our clients, we have questions we have
not been able to answer.
How many illustrations should an item contain to have 336 still image
added to 336 text? At the moment we are assuming half, e.g., an
exhibition catalogue. How much in the way of audio
9 matches
Mail list logo
