Je serai absent(e) à partir du 04/02/2013 de retour le 11/02/2013.
Je répondrai à votre message dès mon retour.
Ce message électronique et les éventuels fichiers attachés sont transmis à
I am happy to hear that you find RAK worthy to be translated for the
English-speaking parts of the world. However, the Committee for Library
Standards, a consortium of large academic libraries and regional networks of
the Federal Republic and of one representative from each of the Austrian and
Am 04.02.2013 13:27, schrieb Frodl, Christine:
... However, the Committee for
Library Standards, a consortium of large academic libraries and
regional networks of the Federal Republic and of one representative
from each of the Austrian and Swiss library systems, the German
public libraries,
Greta de Groat wrote:
I began the RDA test with using the term in common usage in the 300, but
found it was easier said than done. There was no guidance on whether to use DVD, or
whether to use DVD video which is listed as an encoding format in 3.13.3.3. Nor was i
sure whether to use DVD+R
Heidrun,
You are right that 3.4.1.5 is actually an alternative to the basic rule of
recording extent (3.4.1.3). LC put forward a proposal to correct this situation
(http://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/6JSC-LC-17.pdf), which was accepted with revision
at the last JSC meeting (November 2012). This kind
There was a collection of essays called RAK versus AACR : Projekte, Prognosen,
Perspektiven : Beiträge zur aktuellen Regelwerksdiskussion, edited by Petra
Hauke in 2002, to which Heidrun also contributed. Of course, it was in German.
The table of contents is here:
I also understood Heidrun's proposed project in the same way that Ed did.
As a reader and a cataloger, I would be very interested in not just a
translation of RAK into English, but a larger consideration of (past)
German cataloging practice interpreted for a non-German audience. I think
it
Actually, Andrew Osborn, with similar motivation, translated RAK's predecessor,
the Prussian Instructions (2nd ed., 1908), into English back in 1938.
http://lccn.loc.gov/38023141
There is also a practical aspect to all this: Records constructed according to
RAK are a growing part of OCLC
Hi,
Is there a note order requirement in RDA? I searched RDA Toolkit and found
Order of Elements in Appendix D.1 ISBD Presentation (LC PCC PS). There is
an element listing order in note area. Does it indicate a note order?
I looked at JSC examples of RDA records. They seem to show an order of
Count me in as one in the Anglo-American world very interested in the way
[cataloging (not just authority control)] is done in Germany.I have been
particularly fortunate to sit in on the MARBI meetings, where the DNB
Representative Reinhold Heuvelmann has given some insights into the
I have read articles that discuss REICAT (the Italian cataloguing code) and
compare the principles in it with the principles of the FRBR model. Could
anyone direct me to a similar comparison of the FRBR principles and RAK, or
cataloguing generally in Germany? I know very little about German
Mac, I think it was you that made the suggestion to qualify the GMD with
the SMD.
For instance |h [videorecording : video cassette]
I always thought that was a neat suggestion.
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 11:10 AM, J. McRee Elrod m...@slc.bc.ca wrote:
I said:
Certainly SLC will use exact unit
For instance |h [videorecording : video cassette]
Prior to RDA, I suggested following the AACR2 pattern of [text (large
print)] with, for example, [videorecording (VHS)], [videorecording
(DVD)], if one wished a more exact GMD, as opposed to either
substituting the SMD, or making something up
04.02.2013 18:42, Charles Croissant:
One caveat: I learned after publication via a German review that the
example I gave of a Stuecktitelaufnahme was flawed. If I recollect
correctly, the problem was that in the situation I described, the
presence of a common title would have led under RAK to
Amanda,
unlike REICAT, RAK is pre-FRBR. It is, as it were, of the same
generation as AACR2. Still, there are some interesting differences
between RAK and AACR2.
In the mid-1990s, there was a project to develop a modernized version of
RAK under the working title RAK2. Among other things, the
15 matches
Mail list logo
