From the 1st April 2013, RDA : Resource Description and Access
http://www.rdatoolkit.org/ , replaced the Anglo-American Cataloguing
Rules, 2nd edition, as the British Library's official descriptive
cataloguing standard, for records added to the British National
Bibliography and British Library
Am 02.04.2013 14:00, schrieb Danskin, Alan:
From the 1^st April 2013/, RDA : Resource Description and Access
http://www.rdatoolkit.org//, replaced the /Anglo-American Cataloguing
Rules/, 2^nd edition, as the British Library’s official descriptive
cataloguing standard, for records added to the
Just a comment.
In the old days, a book might have a copyright date, with a second date listed
on the book. Was it a new publication or a reprint? The instruction at that
time was that if it was made with the same 'plates' it was considered to be a
reprint. Sometimes the books had the same
It was very useful to be able to see the example you are dealing with-thanks
for that.
Based on the t.p. and verso (which Springer makes public), I would say that
Giorgio is a contributor (in the RDA sense) at the expression level.
When you cannot pick a specific relationship designator,
I don't think contributor is defined in RDA appendix I. There is I.3.1 the
list titled, relationship designators for contributors [associated with an
expression] but no actual term contributor in that list, or any of the
others.
Is this something that perhaps is in the JSC relator term
Based on Deborah's information, the key instruction here is from I.1 If the
element used to record the relationship (e.g., creator) is considered
sufficient for the purposes of the agency creating the data, do not use a
relationship designator to indicate the specific nature of the
(1) Recent documents posted to the JSC web site (
http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html):
-- 6JSC/BL/3/Rev/Sec final/rev
-- 6JSC/LC/11/Sec final/rev
-- 6JSC/Policy/3 [Duty statement for the JSC Secretary]
The revisions to the Sec final documents for 6JSC/BL/3/Rev and for
6JSC/LC/11 adds
Hello,
I found in LC's Code List for Relators, Term Sequence.
http://www.loc.gov/marc/relators/relaterm.html
Contributor [ctb]
Use for a person or organization one whose work has been contributed to a
larger work, such as an anthology, serial publication, or other compilation of
individual
Disclaimer: I am not an expert on facsimiles/reproductions, and might be way
off base here, but I think this is an underlying issue that we have not been
covering, in this example.
Remember that Chris said: A professor here wrote to the choreographer of a
performance he saw to find out if it was
Hi folks, need some wisdom.
I'm working on a shorthand cheat sheet for RDA. My question: in the extent
element [300 field in MARC], it says to use the word approximately with an
estimation of units if the number cannot be easily ascertained. All of the
examples have approximately in lower
I am just looking at an LC record for a title which includes significant
coloured illustrations. There are two 336's: one for text and one for still
image.
I see the point, but of all the LC's RDA records for illustrated titles so far,
this is the only one I've encountered handled this way -
We have decided to include two 336s for text and still image when the title
includes images or artwork which are and integral part of the story, as in
picture books for children and graphic novels.
Sandra Knapp
Head Cataloguer
hours: 8:00 am to 3:30 pm, Mon-Fri.
Waterloo Region District School
That is what we have decided to do as well. For the more usual illustrated
books, where the illustrations expand on or illuminate but are not central
to the intellectual or artistic content, we just use the 336 for text.
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Sandra Knapp
Deborah Fritz made some sensible points, but ...
So, rather than trying to discover that (who made the DVD), perhaps we
should just invoke the CORE instruction and just give the date (which is the
only core Production Statement element) that we think the copy was made
(perhaps [2013?])
The dance
Alison Hitchens posted:
/ Giuseppe Barbaro, Franck Boccara (Eds) ; in cooperation with Giorgio Barb=
arini
=3D700 1\$aBarbaro, Giuseppe,$eeditor of compilation.
=3D700 1\$aBoccara, Franck$eeditor of compilation.
=3D700 1\$aBarbarini, Giorgio.
How about Barbarini, Giorgia,$econtributor.?
In addition to what others have said, I use an additional 336 for catalogs in
which the illustrative matter forms the principal part of the work.
I suspect that any time the 300 field indicates that a work consists chiefly of
illustrations, then an additional 336 for still images would be
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod
Sent: April-02-13 2:17 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] relationship designator and in cooperation with
Amanda posted:
approximately 60 slides
approximately 600 pages
Apart from capitalization, there is the problem of Anglocentrism.
If we can't use ca. 60 slides, how about [60?] slides?
__ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca)
{__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing
Karen Nelson posted:
I am just looking at an LC record for a title which includes
significant coloured illustrations. There are two 336's: one for
text and one for still image.
RDA has options ranging from giving all, to giving just the single
most prominent. This will be another area of
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod
Sent: April-02-13 3:21 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Capitalization of approximately in 300
Thanks Mac, I may have missed it on the list if there was a discussion that we
could use element names as relators. I had RDA-L set to no mail while I was
away!
I've been going by the LC RDA training modules and they give the example of
publisher: Publisher isn't used as an RDA relationship
Amanda,
All of the examples have approximately in lower case:
approximately 60 slides
approximately 600 pages
Granted that RDA doesn't give things in MARC format, but as the first element
shouldn't the approximately be capitalized?
300 Approximately 60 slides : $b etc.
I believe
Thanks Heidrun.
I'm wondering then about RDA A.9-- Capitalize the first word or abbreviation
of a word when recording details of an element. I'm not sure I properly
understand what they mean by details of an element. I would assume this would
mean whatever text makes up an element, but I
I'm rather puzzled by A.9 myself.
As 7.13.2.4 is mentioned as an example, I assume the instruction refers
to a number of elements, mostly in chapter 3, which have the word
details as part of the element name, e.g.:
3.6.1.4 Details of base materials
3.7.1.4 Details of applied materials
3.9.1.4
Heidrun Wiesenmüller wiesenmuel...@hdm-stuttgart.de wrote:
Well, let’s wait and see what Chris Oliver has come up with. I
gather the rest of the reworded chapters should appear soon in the Toolkit
(by the way, wasn't it announced that chapters 2 and 3 should be published
in February?).
Curiously, in AACR2 2.5B7, the initial term in the extent examples is ca.
which is now approximately in RDA, but it's ca. not Ca. Was AACR2 being
inconsistent with ISBD in the examples?
Steven Arakawa
Catalog Librarian for Training Documentation
Catalog Metada Services
Sterling Memorial
One of the lines has Montclaire; should be Montclair. I used to go there a
lot in my youth. Bloomfield and Montclair were huge football rivals.
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 1:04 PM, J. McRee Elrod m...@slc.bc.ca wrote:
Chris Fox posted:
ferocious beauty:
GENOME
Liz Lerman
Dance Exchange
Heidrun Wiesenmüller wiesenmuel...@hdm-stuttgart.de wrote:
But be that as it may: There is indeed an example for a grammatically
incomplete s-o-r in the ISBD (which was news to me), and this must give us
cause to think again (although of course we know that RDA deviates from the
ISBD
Arakawa, Steven steven.arak...@yale.edu wrote:
Curiously, in AACR2 2.5B7, the initial term in the extent examples is
ca. which is now approximately in RDA, but it's ca. not Ca. Was
AACR2 being inconsistent with ISBD in the examples?
Looks like it. And there are also leaves 81-149 and p.
Amanda Sprochi sproc...@health.missouri.edu wrote:
I'm working on a shorthand cheat sheet for RDA. My question: in the extent
element [300 field in MARC], it says to use the word approximately with an
estimation of units if the number cannot be easily ascertained. All of the
examples have
Alison Hitchens ahitc...@uwaterloo.ca wrote:
Thanks Mac, I may have missed it on the list if there was a discussion
that we could use element names as relators. I had RDA-L set to no mail
while I was away!
I've been going by the LC RDA training modules and they give the example
of
Fox, Chris c...@byui.edu wrote:
I'm fine with going with just the date, if there's agreement that it isn't
published
I was going to comment on this point up-thread, but was waylaid till now.
Is the choreographer creating DVDs of the performance for whomever asks for
it? If so, this sounds
Michael Borries posted:
I have wondered whether originally the approach of separating
publication date and copyright date didn't arise, in part, at least,
from this phenomenon of having books published earlier than the
copyright date indicates.
I don't think so. Both rules and standards say to
33 matches
Mail list logo
