Mac said:
If the place is part of the corporate body name, obviously a
geographical qualifier is not needed for the name used as an entry. If
removing that geographic name for a cross reference, should it not
then be a qualifier at the end of the shorter form of the name?
Exactly. And
Richard,
That sounds very sensible to me. So, as there was only a vague statement
in my Johannes Secundus example, and the conference was not really
named in the resource, I would refrain from creating an authority record
for the conference at all (and also not trouble to try and find out
Colleagues,
Please excuse duplication.
*
*Ulrich’s Serials Librarianship Award*
Presented by the ALCTS Continuing Resources Section, the Ulrich’s Serials
Librarianship award consists of a citation and $1,500 donated by donated by
ProQuest, through its Serials Solutions business unit. The
Heidrun said concerning qualifying corporate body cross references:
But I was amazed that this doesn't seem to be absolutely necessary under
RDA.
That is but one of *many* long established helpful to patrons
practices which are not absolutely necessary under RDA, but I hope
we will continue
Heidrun said:
According to common usage among German librarians, the name of the
Hamburg conference is 101st German Librarians' Conference, and not
Libraries - portals to the world of knowledge.
We would make that theme:
246 1 $iConference theme:$aLibraries - portals to the world of
Apologies in advance if this has been covered before, but I am trying to
decide whether to include the term stereo in the description of CDs (RDA
3.16.8.3, MARC 344 $g) when the resource itself doesn't specify the number
of playback channels. Some cataloging agencies do, presumably on the
Technically, a CD made according to Red Book specifications is probably most
often going to be stereo in that it has data assigned to both left and right
channels. But if it's just a mono track being duplicated in those channels,
then that really wouldn't be stereo as far as what the RDA
7 matches
Mail list logo
