that they also used Gebietskoerperschaft for government.
Perhaps the question was discussed by the AACR2 translation team as well.
If so, perhaps Charles Croissant, who was a member of the team, could add
some details here (if he's following this thread)?
By way of responding to Heidrun's
--
-
Prof. Heidrun Wiesenmueller M.A.
Stuttgart Media University
Wolframstr. 32, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany
www.hdm-stuttgart.de/bi
--
Charles Croissant
Senior Catalog Librarian
Pius XII Memorial Library
Saint Louis University
St. Louis, MO 63108
, this is an Anglocentric usage and as such should be a
candidate for rewording, if RDA indeed aspires to be an international
cataloging code. I would strongly support a rewording of the rule along the
lines she suggests.
Charles Croissant
Senior Catalog Librarian
Pius XII Memorial Library
Saint Louis University
St. Louis
--
-
Prof. Heidrun Wiesenmueller M.A.
Stuttgart Media University
Faculty of Information and Communication
Wolframstr. 32, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany
www.hdm-stuttgart.de/bi
--
Charles Croissant
Senior Catalog Librarian
Pius XII Memorial Library
Saint Louis University
St. Louis, MO 63108
extra-canonical books.
There may be a need here to propose a change to the instructions. I'd be
interested in hearing from others who have lots of Bible-related headings
to deal with.
http://access.rdatoolkit.org/document.php?id=rdachp6target=rda6-2596#rda6-2596
Charles Croissant
Senior Catalog
John Hostage wrote:
Our rules for omitting initial articles are based on the limitations of
our 20th-century systems. I don't think RDA is or should be concerned
with such MARC implementation issues. We librarians have gotten used to
it, but there are many titles that look odd without the
Bernhard Eversberg wrote:
Adam Schiff wrote:
I think I am in agreement with rule 1.6.8 that says to transcribe an
inaccuracy as it appears. I now think that this should be done in all
instances, and that a uniform title should be made to correct the
inaccuracy. Establishing a uniform
Bernhard Eversberg wrote:
Gunilla Jonsson wrote:
I find the proposed treatment better, both from a principal point of
view and a practical one.
... For the sake of global record exchange, it is also better to
follow the instruction proposed in 1.6.8 -- you cannot be sure that
all cataloguers
8 matches
Mail list logo