Smith
Envoyé : 20 juillet 2012 17:42
À : RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Objet : Re: [RDA-L] AACR2 records in OCLC
I don't really see that RDA records have an advantage over AACR2. Especially
in a shared environment where some records follow the rule of three and some
don't. I believe we'll save
On 19/07/2012 21:31, Robert Maxwell wrote:
snip
For the same reasons we might upgrade a pre-AACR2 record to AACR2. RDA
records have lots of advantages over AACR2 records. The abolishment of
the rule of three is an example that comes to mind quickly.
/snip
Revising the rule of three to the rule
Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Mike Tribby
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 3:59 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] AACR2 records in OCLC
I think the vanguard of the RDA Armada should try to slow your roll and wait
for implementation day
www.bostonathenaeum.org
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Mike Tribby
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 3:59 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] AACR2 records in OCLC
I think
I have not seen a change in this policy yet, so am assuming the answer is No.
Paige
From: "Jacqueline Jo Byrd" b...@indiana.eduTo: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CASent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 2:14:37 PMSubject: [RDA-L] AACR2 records in OCLC
I am preparing to train some of our
, 2012 2:14:37 PM
Subject: [RDA-L] AACR2 records in OCLC
[cid:image001.gif@01CD65BE.7B780FF0]
I am preparing to train some of our catalogers on RDA, and I have a question:
Are we now allowed to change a full-level AACR2 record to RDA and replace the
master record in OCLC? I know that at one time we
-9620 (office)
773-702-2885 (fax)
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Carras, Darla Black
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 1:55 PM
To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] AACR2 records in OCLC
At ALA
to the next category of records?
Paige
From: "Pat Sayre McCoy" p...@uchicago.eduTo: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CASent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 3:24:39 PMSubject: Re: [RDA-L] AACR2 records in OCLC
My understanding was that we would not recatalog AACR2 master records to RDA. Why would we?
.
** **
*From:* Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] *On Behalf Of *Pat Sayre McCoy
*Sent:* Thursday, July 19, 2012 1:25 PM
*To:* RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
*Subject:* Re: [RDA-L] AACR2 records in OCLC
** **
My
R. Snow,
1842.
** **
*From:* Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and
Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] *On Behalf Of *Pat Sayre
McCoy
*Sent:* Thursday, July 19, 2012 1:25 PM
*To:* RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
*Subject:* Re: [RDA-L] AACR2 records in OCLC
/ Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Robert Maxwell
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 2:32 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] AACR2 records in OCLC
For the same reasons we might upgrade a pre-AACR2 record to AACR2. RDA records
have lots
McCoy
*Sent:* Thursday, July 19, 2012 1:25 PM
*To:* RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
*Subject:* Re: [RDA-L] AACR2 records in OCLC
** **
My understanding was that we would not recatalog AACR2 master records to
RDA. Why would we? Authority records will be updated but why bib records?
Pat
Robert Maxwell said:
For the same reasons we might upgrade a pre-AACR2 record to AACR2.
While I agree that changing a pre AACR2 record to AACR2 is an
upgrade, I'm not certain that is the correct term for chaning an
AACR2 record to RDA, particularly if only core elements are supplied.
Removing
13 matches
Mail list logo
