| Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 11:38
| To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
| Subject: [RDA-L] Media type for streaming video
|
| I had always assumed that the 33x fields for streaming video
| should
| look like this due to the online nature of the resource:
|
| 336 __ $a two-dimensional moving
-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Kelley McGrath
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 11:38
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: [RDA-L] Media type for streaming video
I had always assumed that the 33x
-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Media type for streaming video
Forgive the rant and ignorance of one stuck in the one dimensional 300 field.
I've not clearly understood the concept of the three part construct of content,
media, carrier let alone its finer delineations and declensions. Two
dimensional
Jack Wu said:
Two dimensional moving image which leaves out sound ...
Jack, I empathize with your reaction to RDA media terms, and share
your frustration. But one does not have to leave out sound. Media
terms are repeating, either in repeating $a or repeating fields.
(Most prefer repeating
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod
Sent: February-26-13 1:29 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Media type for streaming video
Jack Wu
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 7:06:40 PM
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Media type for streaming video
OLAC is in the process of updating its streaming media best practices to be
RDA-compatible so it's coming soon.
I do think there is something fundamentally wrong with the computer media
type
I had always assumed that the 33x fields for streaming video should look like
this due to the online nature of the resource:
336 __ $a two-dimensional moving image $2 rdacontent
337 __ $a computer $2 rdamedia
338 __ $a online resource $2 rdacarrier
However, I was recently reviewing something
Kelly McGrath posted for streaming videos:
336 __ $a two-dimensional moving image $2 rdacontent
337 __ $a computer $2 rdamedia
338 __ $a online resource $2 rdacarrier
I agree with your choice of 336 and 338. I think most patrons would
think of video as a disk played on a device.
The one
)
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Kelley McGrath
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 11:38
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: [RDA-L] Media type for streaming video
I
: [RDA-L] Media type for streaming video
I had always assumed that the 33x fields for streaming video should
look like this due to the online nature of the resource:
336 __ $a two-dimensional moving image $2 rdacontent
337 __ $a computer $2 rdamedia
338 __ $a online resource $2 rdacarrier
-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: [RDA-L] Media type for streaming video
I had always assumed that the 33x fields for streaming video should
look like this due to the online nature of the resource:
336 __ $a two-dimensional moving image $2 rdacontent
337 __ $a computer $2 rdamedia
338 __ $a online resource
Sean Chen said:
I believe the computer media type is now irrelevant and I think that =
referring to things as needing a computer is not going to be in =
alignment with how users are doing FISO.
I of course agree.
I have no argument that electronic is better as a media type than
digital.
12 matches
Mail list logo