Re: [RDA-L] Media type for streaming video

2013-02-26 Thread JOHN C ATTIG
| Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 11:38 | To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA | Subject: [RDA-L] Media type for streaming video | | I had always assumed that the 33x fields for streaming video | should | look like this due to the online nature of the resource: | | 336 __ $a two-dimensional moving

Re: [RDA-L] Media type for streaming video

2013-02-26 Thread Jack Wu
- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Kelley McGrath Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 11:38 To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: [RDA-L] Media type for streaming video I had always assumed that the 33x

Re: [RDA-L] Media type for streaming video

2013-02-26 Thread Brenndorfer, Thomas
-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Media type for streaming video Forgive the rant and ignorance of one stuck in the one dimensional 300 field. I've not clearly understood the concept of the three part construct of content, media, carrier let alone its finer delineations and declensions. Two dimensional

Re: [RDA-L] Media type for streaming video

2013-02-26 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Jack Wu said: Two dimensional moving image which leaves out sound ... Jack, I empathize with your reaction to RDA media terms, and share your frustration. But one does not have to leave out sound. Media terms are repeating, either in repeating $a or repeating fields. (Most prefer repeating

Re: [RDA-L] Media type for streaming video

2013-02-26 Thread Brenndorfer, Thomas
-Original Message- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod Sent: February-26-13 1:29 PM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Media type for streaming video Jack Wu

Re: [RDA-L] Media type for streaming video

2013-02-26 Thread Sean Chen
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 7:06:40 PM Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Media type for streaming video OLAC is in the process of updating its streaming media best practices to be RDA-compatible so it's coming soon. I do think there is something fundamentally wrong with the computer media type

[RDA-L] Media type for streaming video

2013-02-25 Thread Kelley McGrath
I had always assumed that the 33x fields for streaming video should look like this due to the online nature of the resource: 336 __ $a two-dimensional moving image $2 rdacontent 337 __ $a computer $2 rdamedia 338 __ $a online resource $2 rdacarrier However, I was recently reviewing something

Re: [RDA-L] Media type for streaming video

2013-02-25 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Kelly McGrath posted for streaming videos: 336 __ $a two-dimensional moving image $2 rdacontent 337 __ $a computer $2 rdamedia 338 __ $a online resource $2 rdacarrier I agree with your choice of 336 and 338. I think most patrons would think of video as a disk played on a device. The one

Re: [RDA-L] Media type for streaming video

2013-02-25 Thread John Hostage
) -Original Message- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Kelley McGrath Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 11:38 To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: [RDA-L] Media type for streaming video I

Re: [RDA-L] Media type for streaming video

2013-02-25 Thread Kelley McGrath
: [RDA-L] Media type for streaming video I had always assumed that the 33x fields for streaming video should look like this due to the online nature of the resource: 336 __ $a two-dimensional moving image $2 rdacontent 337 __ $a computer $2 rdamedia 338 __ $a online resource $2 rdacarrier

Re: [RDA-L] Media type for streaming video

2013-02-25 Thread Sean Chen
-BAC.GC.CA Subject: [RDA-L] Media type for streaming video I had always assumed that the 33x fields for streaming video should look like this due to the online nature of the resource: 336 __ $a two-dimensional moving image $2 rdacontent 337 __ $a computer $2 rdamedia 338 __ $a online resource

Re: [RDA-L] Media type for streaming video

2013-02-25 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Sean Chen said: I believe the computer media type is now irrelevant and I think that = referring to things as needing a computer is not going to be in = alignment with how users are doing FISO. I of course agree. I have no argument that electronic is better as a media type than digital.