Re: [RDA-L] Cost of Retrospective Conversion for Legacy Data (Was RDA Toolkit Price Change)

2013-11-25 Thread Guy Vernon Frost
You can also customize is a little for no additional charge. For example, we chose not to have MARCIVE convert the 250 which is a descriptive field. For the record, I'm not too happy with some of their choices for the 336-338 fields, but we send so little that isn't RDA converted already that I

Re: [RDA-L] Cost of Retrospective Conversion for Legacy Data (Was RDA Toolkit Price Change)

2013-11-25 Thread Gary L Strawn
If anyone is interested, Appendixes E, F and G of the documentation for the cataloger's toolkit describe many of the RDA-related changes we are making in our database. At present we are changing one record at a time (as we do other work on the record), but I expect to have a batch program

Re: [RDA-L] Cost of Retrospective Conversion for Legacy Data (Was RDA Toolkit Price Change)

2013-11-25 Thread Benjamin A Abrahamse
For the most part I don't think there is any pressing need to convert pre-RDA descriptive cataloging. The changes to the descriptive portion of the record are more or less aesthetic (p. vs pages for example). We have lived with AACR2 and pre-AACR2 records living cheek-by-jowl in our catalogs

Re: [RDA-L] Cost of Retrospective Conversion for Legacy Data (Was RDA Toolkit Price Change)

2013-11-23 Thread Jenifer K Marquardt
Some basic conversion is being done by vendors, though, of course, adding relationship designators isn't an easily automated process. Just as an example, here is the announcement from our authorities vendor MARCIVE. I've left in the contact and marketing information just in case anyone is