Hi Jonas,
Great news! Fsync is useful but not in you scenario. I'm glad it worked for
you.
Don't hesitate to come back of you have other questions.
On Wed., Jun. 2, 2021, 4:56 a.m. Jonas Schöpf,
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Thank you again for your help!
>
> With the "--no-fsync" argument, the backup
Hi!
Thank you again for your help!
With the "--no-fsync" argument, the backup succeeded after 13 minutes.
Cheers,
Jonas
On 6/1/21 9:53 PM, Jonas Schöpf wrote:
> Hi Patrik!
>
> On 6/1/21 4:48 PM, Patrik Dufresne wrote:
>> Hello Jonas,
>>
>> Welcome to rdiff-backup ! Let me try to help you a
Hi Patrik!
On 6/1/21 4:48 PM, Patrik Dufresne wrote:
> Hello Jonas,
>
> Welcome to rdiff-backup ! Let me try to help you a bit more with you
> problem.
Thanks :)
>
> First, the first backup always take alot of time because rdiff-backup is
> not like a simple copy and alot of overhead are done
On 6/1/21 4:20 PM, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
> "Jonas Schoepf"
>
>> My drive is connected via USB.
>
> I think we're on the right track. What version of USB?
I have a USB 3.2 Gen 1.
>
>> Before using rdiff-backup I used just rsync, where the initial backup
>> took also quite long, but the
On 2021-06-01 10:32 a.m., Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
Alvin Starr wrote:
I thought rdiff-backup like rsync keeps track of the file metadata
like size and creation date to skip reading the data again if the
file has not been updated?
I assume rdiff-backup does the same thing to decide if a file
Hello Jonas,
Welcome to rdiff-backup ! Let me try to help you a bit more with you
problem.
First, the first backup always take alot of time because rdiff-backup is
not like a simple copy and alot of overhead are done in the background to
put in place the first version of the data.
Second, with
Alvin Starr wrote:
> I thought rdiff-backup like rsync keeps track of the file metadata
> like size and creation date to skip reading the data again if the
> file has not been updated?
I assume rdiff-backup does the same thing to decide if a file has
changed, but if there's a change, rsync
On 2021-06-01 10:20 a.m., Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
"Jonas Schoepf"
My drive is connected via USB.
I think we're on the right track. What version of USB?
Before using rdiff-backup I used just rsync, where the initial backup
took also quite long, but the following backups took ~20
"Jonas Schoepf"
> My drive is connected via USB.
I think we're on the right track. What version of USB?
> Before using rdiff-backup I used just rsync, where the initial backup
> took also quite long, but the following backups took ~20 minutes.
rdiff-backup will always be slower than rsync,
My drive is connected via USB.
Before using rdiff-backup I used just rsync, where the initial backup
took also quite long, but the following backups took ~20 minutes.
- Jonas
On 6/1/21 4:03 PM, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
> Jonas Schoepf wrote:
>
>> I understand that the initial backup is
Jonas Schoepf wrote:
> I understand that the initial backup is really slow and took more
> than ~10h for my 400 GB.
I'd suspect slow reading or writing speeds. How are the drives
connected (SATA, USB, network, etc.)?
--
Yves Bellefeuille
Thank you for the quick response!
The current backup runs since 6h and it only uses around 1-2% of the CPU.
There is also no gzip process running.
So it might be something else...
- Jonas
On 6/1/21 3:15 PM, Reio Remma wrote:
> On 01.06.2021 16:12, Jonas Schöpf wrote:
>> Hi all!
>>
>> I found
On 01.06.2021 16:12, Jonas Schöpf wrote:
Hi all!
I found out about rdiff-backup two weeks ago after I searched for a
method to get incremental backups of my system.
I experience some problems while doing my backup and I hope that
somebody can tell me what I am doing wrong.
I understand that
13 matches
Mail list logo
