Hi Kirk,
Paolo has already pointed out the tools to use if you want to have control
over the process. There's also a convenience function available,
AllChem.ConstrainedEmbed(), that makes the process a bit easier:
http://www.rdkit.org/docs/api/rdkit.Chem.AllChem-module.html#ConstrainedEmbed
In working with RDKit I've been able to align 2D structures based upon a
common core of MCS using
AllChem.GenerateDepictionMatching2DStructure(m,p)
The next step for me is to generate 3D structures and align them based upon
that same common core. Obviously this leads to multiple steps, not the
Back again!
I apologize for resurrecting an old topic, but I'm once again trying to
work with PyMOL through RDKit. I've been following the approach in this
thread (
http://www.mail-archive.com/rdkit-discuss%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg00325.html)
but it seems not to work any longer. I'm using
Dear Rafal,
On 22/04/2016 17:15, Rafal Roszak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to find:
> A) "global minimum" [*] for given compound(s) and
> B) (for the same compound) minimum with constraint(s) (e.g. frozen
> angle)
>
> For problem A) I tried folowing code:
>
> self.MOLEC=Chem.MolFromSmiles(SMILES)
Now I think I know and I very much look forward to a more detailed
documentation.
many thanks,
-Monica
At 2016-04-22 17:48:39, "Greg Landrum" wrote:
There isn't great documentation for this, but the way the current code works is
reasonably simple.
If your
There isn't great documentation for this, but the way the current code
works is reasonably simple.
If your reaction has two products (i.e. two molecules separated by a dot),
you will get two products (i.e. two separate molecules) when you call
RunReactants(); that's what you asked for.
Here's a
Hi Grégori,
Maybe I don't have a clear understanding of this function, I know the dot
represent disconncction of two fragments ,and I suppose changes just occurs
in mapped molecular fragment, the remaining part of reactant is invariable, in
other words, if mapped molecular fragment breaks
Hi Monica,
As Greg stated, why do you expect your product not to be fragmented?
I suggest you to have a careful look at the SMARTS definition (for
instance from Daylight:
http://www.daylight.com/dayhtml/doc/theory/theory.smarts.html)
In SMARTS patterns, the dot indicates disconnected fragments.
Greg,
After changing the pattern into
"[C:1][C:2](=[O:3])[N+0:4][C:5]=[C:6][C:7]([O-:8])=[O:9].[OH2:10].[OH2:11]>>[C:1][C:2]([O-:10])=[O:3].[O:8]=[C:7]=[O:9].[N+:4].[C:6][C:5]=[O:11]
, I get the same result .A ring structure just like you said is broken into
pieces.
9 matches
Mail list logo