Re: [Rdkit-discuss] Beta of Q4 2012 release

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Gianluca Sforna wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Greg Landrum > wrote: > > Gianluca: would I need to do a new beta release for your testing to > work or > > can you pull from svn? > > svn is fine for me Ok, great. I will get the older build working ag

Re: [Rdkit-discuss] Beta of Q4 2012 release

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Greg Landrum wrote: > That's going to lead to an interesting situation when v8.4 is EOL'ed in the > summer of 2014 (http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/). Yeah, but they (Red Hat) have paid engineers on most upstream projects they give support on. I think

Re: [Rdkit-discuss] Beta of Q4 2012 release

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:42 AM, Gianluca Sforna wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Greg Landrum > wrote: > > What version of Postgres is available on those systems? > > > > I could "de-deprecate" the support for older versions if there's an > argument > > for it. > > > > It is an 8.4. An

Re: [Rdkit-discuss] Beta of Q4 2012 release

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Greg Landrum wrote: > What version of Postgres is available on those systems? > > I could "de-deprecate" the support for older versions if there's an argument > for it. > It is an 8.4. And unless they add a parallel installable 9.x, this will be there for the whol

Re: [Rdkit-discuss] Beta of Q4 2012 release

Hi Gianluca, On Sunday, January 13, 2013, Gianluca Sforna wrote: > > RPM packages builds correctly in Fedora 17/18. CentOS/RHEL 6 builds > fails because postgres 9.1 or newer is now required. What version of Postgres is available on those systems? I could "de-deprecate" the support for older v

[Rdkit-discuss] Beta of Q4 2012 release

Dear all, Today I tagged the beta for the 2012.12 release in svn: http://rdkit.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/rdkit/tags/Release_2012_12_1beta1/ and uploaded a source distribution to the google code site: *http://rdkit.google