Re: [Readable-discuss] wisp now defaults to activating curly-infix

2014-11-18 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Hi David, Am Donnerstag, 13. November 2014, 18:23:01 schrieb David A. Wheeler: > On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 21:56:19 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide > wrote: > > I considered it, but decided against it, because in wisp that provides > > less advantages than in sweet expressions, while adding ambiguity (on

Re: [Readable-discuss] wisp now defaults to activating curly-infix

2014-11-18 Thread David A. Wheeler
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 23:46:44 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > ... Yes, if you know > all the sweet syntax, quite a few code snippets will likely look more > readable than those in wisp. But the additional syntax elements > provide a high barrier for learning, because they require retraining