Re: [Readable-discuss] wisp now defaults to activating curly-infix

2014-11-21 Thread Arne Bab.
At Wed, 19 Nov 2014 15:46:54 -0500 (EST), dwheeler wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 20:48:28 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide > wrote: > > It’s crazy to think that nowadays it’s actually possible to do > > > > guile -L . --language=wisp tests/factorial.w > > > > and have guile execute the file

Re: [Readable-discuss] wisp now defaults to activating curly-infix

2014-11-20 Thread Jörg F. Wittenberger
Am 19.11.2014 um 20:48 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide: > And for example today Mu Lei (Nala Ginrut) had the idea of > representing sxml templates as wisp - a case where I think the sweet > <* *> syntax could come in really handy. I can agree. Using SXML with sweet (in that case) works quite well.

Re: [Readable-discuss] wisp now defaults to activating curly-infix

2014-11-19 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Hi David, Am Dienstag, 18. November 2014, 22:28:11 schrieb David A. Wheeler: > > It comes down to personal preferences: The weight we give to different > > aesthetic aspects of programming languages. For me, the syntactic > > simplicity is one of the main selling points of lisp and scheme, and > >

Re: [Readable-discuss] wisp now defaults to activating curly-infix

2014-11-18 Thread David A. Wheeler
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 23:46:44 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > ... Yes, if you know > all the sweet syntax, quite a few code snippets will likely look more > readable than those in wisp. But the additional syntax elements > provide a high barrier for learning, because they require retraining

Re: [Readable-discuss] wisp now defaults to activating curly-infix

2014-11-18 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Hi David, Am Donnerstag, 13. November 2014, 18:23:01 schrieb David A. Wheeler: > On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 21:56:19 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide > wrote: > > I considered it, but decided against it, because in wisp that provides > > less advantages than in sweet expressions, while adding ambiguity (on

Re: [Readable-discuss] wisp now defaults to activating curly-infix

2014-11-13 Thread David A. Wheeler
I said: > > Very cool! Have you considered making neoteric active by default as well? On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 21:56:19 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > I considered it, but decided against it, because in wisp that provides > less advantages than in sweet expressions, while adding ambiguity (on

Re: [Readable-discuss] wisp now defaults to activating curly-infix

2014-11-13 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Hi David, Am Sonntag, 9. November 2014, 19:10:32 schrieb David A. Wheeler: > > With the new release of wisp, curly infix is active by default: > > > > http://draketo.de/light/english/wisp-lisp-indentation-preprocessor#v0.8.0 > Very cool! Have you considered making neoteric active by default

Re: [Readable-discuss] wisp now defaults to activating curly-infix

2014-11-09 Thread David A. Wheeler
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 00:27:02 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Hi, > > With the new release of wisp, curly infix is active by default: > > http://draketo.de/light/english/wisp-lisp-indentation-preprocessor#v0.8.0 > > Also the implementation became more similar to readable (using read