- Liam
___
.
In The Spirit Of Crazy Horse
http://itsoch.hypermart.net
KOLA Action Group
http://kola-hq.hypermart.net
Journey of Healing
http://www.journeyofhealing.com
.___
-Original Message-
From: Webcentral [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: '[EMAIL
Sorry, Trudy - just presumed because it was with the article.
BTW Any chance of a last-minute conversion? Only one more sleep to go!
Tim
It wasn't Rob Sitch but me;-)
Trudy
tdunlop wrote:
Interesting that Rob Sitch quotes Ghandi in the article below, India
being
one of
No, I'm afraid not.
Ah, well. I guess we can have all the arguments again at the next
referendum - if I'm not too arthritic to type by then ;-)
Did you happen to see Lateline either last night or today? It was a very
good discussion and brought up many
points as to why even though 91% (in
Thought this might be of interest to people.
Seize the Time - says respected Aboriginal Rights activist Terry O'Shane
On the eve of the referendum, Terry O'Shane, one of the most senior and
respected activists for Aboriginal and human rights for more than 30
tdunlop wrote:
No, I'm afraid not.
Ah, well. I guess we can have all the arguments again at the next
referendum - if I'm not too arthritic to type by then ;-)
Well, it's not stopping me, so you have nothing to worry about. ;-)
Did you happen to see Lateline either last night or today?
Hi Trudy
Doesn't all this remind you of a magicians sleight of hand. The name of the game appears to be misdirection. I am wondering what we are going to find out about after all this furor is over.
What did get pushed through parliament while we looked elsewhere?
At 03:24 PM 11/5/99 +1100,
Maybe enough of all those
republicans out there will find it just too hard to vote for the Queen
once
they're in the booth? We'll see I guess
If that was the problem then the result would be different. Most are not
voting 'for' the Queen but against
the model...
Trudy
Ah, but the net
tdunlop wrote:
Maybe enough of all those
republicans out there will find it just too hard to vote for the Queen
once
they're in the booth? We'll see I guess
If that was the problem then the result would be different. Most are not
voting 'for' the Queen but against
the model...
Ah, but the net effect is that the Queen (and Howard and her other
supporters) win. Really can't see them letting go of their victory
lightly
(or quickly).
Wasn't it the 'yes' side who discounted 'in effect' when Howard used it?
Can't have it both ways...
(Sorry, couldn't help myself
Peter McGrath wrote:
Hi Trudy
Doesn't all this remind you of a magicians sleight of hand. The name of the game
appears to be misdirection. I am wondering what we are going to find out about after
all this furor is over.
I think we'll be in for a few surprises. I have visions of the ship
tdunlop wrote:
Ah, but the net effect is that the Queen (and Howard and her other
supporters) win. Really can't see them letting go of their victory
lightly
(or quickly).
Wasn't it the 'yes' side who discounted 'in effect' when Howard used it?
Can't have it both ways...
At 04:31 PM 5/11/99, Peter McGrath wrote:
Hi Trudy
Doesn't all this remind you of a magicians sleight of hand. The
name of the game appears to be misdirection. I am wondering what we are
going to find out about after all this furor is over.
What did get pushed through parliament while we
12 matches
Mail list logo
