Hi Casey,
Not sure there is a market for it. Most of the serious developers of
RedDot are using one (free) wrapper or another to get away from RQL in
the first place. It would seem to be a retrograde step to go back to
the 'bad old days' of chopping RQL around.
Just my 2p :-)
John
On Jan 13,
I respectfully disagree. The market is not developers, but
administrators with limited development ability. A developer would
likely just write a simple program to fulfill their needs themselves.
Companies that don't have developers capable of something like this
hire OpenText professional
So, in working with RedDot 10.1 for the last 4 months or so I have
found that there are some things that I would like it to do that it
just doesn't (like releasing pages that other users have saved as
draft for example), or doesn't do well. I discovered the wonders of
RQL and started writing a
Casey,
That sounds like an interesting extension.
I just wanted to let you know that Solution Exchange (SolEx) is for free and
not free solutions. Whether or not you get positive feedback here in the
group, SolEx can be a place where you can market your solution in a
centralized location where
Thanks Emily!
Here are a few screenshots to give you guys a little better idea what
I was talking about.
http://s915.photobucket.com/albums/ac356/ghgknives/RedDot%20Management/?albumview=slideshow
Casey
On Jan 12, 2:59 pm, emily stange esta...@gmail.com wrote:
Casey,
That sounds like an
I doubt that anyone is going to pay for it, mostly because the
audience you are looking at is basically developers which don't have a
budget for it.
The next thing is that there is no benefit for the website end-user,
thus no one will invest in something they don't see a monetary value
in.
Don't
