At 06:29 PM 6/1/98 -0400, you wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jun 1998, W.D.McKinney wrote:
Is there a MB that caches more than 256MB's of RAM ?
There are a smattering of Pentium motherboards which cache 512MB of RAM,
the Intel HX is one of those (provided you have the tag ram) and many of
the Tyan and Asus
Speaking of flames, some of us (ok, just me, for all I know), have a thing
about not liking html in email.
I think we're gonna have to give that one up. It does nicely solve the
problem of "rich" email with a cross-platform, nearly universal markup
language.
It's not the best possible
I'm not 100% sure, but I do believe that putting it in the mbr should be
just fine, LILO goes, and just hands it off to NT normally as I recall.
I have lilo in my MBR, and a fat c: partition, and NT actually boots out of
an NTFS partition. Lilo comes up, I type dos, and am then in the NT
Trying to start a flame war, or what?
I think the question is, best at what? I mean, I kind of like wmx
(http://www.all-day-breakfast.com/wmx/), on my 640x480 screen notebook, but
in a non-ram/pixel (it is actually a little heavy on the cpu though)
constrained environment, I'd want one with
Did you figure this out, if so, what was the fix?
Thanks, and if you have not, let me know, and I will let you know if I
figure it out.
At 04:44 PM 4/25/98 +, you wrote:
I've installed Communicator 4.05, but when I try to start it up, I get:
/usr/lib/netscape/netscape-communicator: error
That's what I did, then ran it manually until it worked.
At 02:03 PM 5/14/98 +0100, you wrote:
Is it all to copy sample.rcfle to the home directory as .fetchmailrc and
editing
that file.
Thanks in advance
osama
Ronald Pottol wrote:
Try the man pages, it is fairly easy to set up, you can
Funny thing being, an OS with good multitasking is a natural for something
like a winmodem, doing it under win3.1 was madness. I mean, you have this
fast cpu essentially doing nothing (my p133 is rarely near 50% load, even
under NT), why not make a dumb modem (but with a big buffer, unlike our
At 10:21 PM 5/6/98 -0700, you wrote:
There is one, somewhere, but it's pretty much ignored. Unix, in
general, is
pretty much invulnerable to virus's.
Invulnerable? What intrinsic quality grants Unix this remarkable
privilege?
it doesn't allow hardware level access -- at least not as
I want to run with a server that serves /usr and /home out to my other
machine. My server is already set up, with a 5.0 "everything" install, and
is working fine. Any tips on doing the client? My instinct is to mount
/usr read only, but I really have no idea what will happen when I specify
/usr
I want to run with a server that serves /usr and /home out to my other
machine. My server is already set up, with a 5.0 "everything" install, and
is working fine. Any tips on doing the client? My instinct is to mount
/usr read only, but I really have no idea what will happen when I specify
/usr
Easier than that, you make a new partition somewhere, copy (preserving all
the permissions) local (or what ever it is), make the entry in the
/etc/fstab , delete the directory from its current location, and mount the
partition as per the fstab entry. Read the appropriate man pages (fstab,
cp,
At 11:31 PM 5/2/98 -0700, you wrote:
New RH5.0 install. AST Manhattan with Adaptec 2940UW controller (same
controller working with RH5.0 in another machine).
Earlier today, installed RH5.0 via FTP. Absolutely no problems during
install. After finishing installation, when rebooting, I get the
At 10:41 AM 5/2/98 +0200, you wrote:
Hi again
First: Thank you all for your suggestions and advice.
I think I will go for the Matrox Millennium II card. Just a cupple of
question:
1) Do I have to download a driver from somewhere or can I just run
Xconfigurator
to get support for this card.
I have been looking at Matrox Millennium II, but maby there are better
choises ?
This is what I demand of the graphics card:
1) I have to be able to use it with Redhat Linux 5.0 without problems with
drivers etc.
2) It should be possible to use all the features the card offers with
Linux
I have a fresh red hat 5 install, done with the "install everything"
option, static ip dial up ppp to my isp, and ethernet to my local lan,
which is using the 10.10.10.0 network, and ip masquerading to reach the
internet. I can send mail, I can check the mail at my isp, but I have one
problem.
Locke
---Ronald Pottol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a fresh red hat 5 install, done with the "install everything"
option, static ip dial up ppp to my isp, and ethernet to my local lan,
which is using the 10.10.10.0 network, and ip masquerading to reach the
internet. I can send m
According to the linux token ring pages, there is currently no support for
any PCI token ring cards. Use a vanilla isa card, that works fine. Check
the howto/mini-howtos.
At 03:16 PM 4/30/98 -0300, you wrote:
Hello All,
Anyone have any luck installing a 3Com PCI token ring card with
Redat
try http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Marcus.Brinkman/soundblaster.html
for the AWE how to, I have not tried it, but he does have a bunch of stuff
on using the AWE32/64 under Linux, including drivers and utilities.
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
btw, how much did you pay for your dual board and 166Mhz chips? Are they
reasonable these days?
Dave
Check out www.pricewatch.com , a PPro 166 with 512k cache can be had for as
little as $180, and PPro 180s are similar, and a dual PPro board goes for
$250-350.
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat
I have a couple that work well too. The problem is that Adaptec
changes their BIOS's and card specs within the the same card model
number. Since they do not release their specs to the Linux community,
the Linux driver for 2940 may or may not work with a particular 2940
card. I have to
http://search.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=322973848
Goes into more detail, especially the problems with NT, than the Linux
Journal article does.
At 01:14 PM 3/25/98 PST, you wrote:
Digital has been tooting its own horn about Digital Domain using
Alpha-based servers for graphics rendering. I
All you need is the cable.probably. I know several people who run
vgaBNC cables, works just fine. The only question is if that monitor can
do vga (640x480@60hz), or you will not see anything until you are in X.
At 09:09 AM 3/22/98 -0500, you wrote:
We have an ancient 19" Hitachi 1280 x 1024
http://linas.org/linux/index.html
Is the linux enterprise computing page, it will have links that will answer
your question.
At 10:59 AM 3/14/98 +0200, you wrote:
how do I compile RedHat4.2's kernel for two processors ?
and How do I get disk mirroring or raid ?
--
PLEASE read the Red
Works fine for me and many others.
Look for SMP as the key work, you delete one ";" from the kernel make file,
there by un commenting the smp=1 line, build a kernel, and you have smp.
I am running red hat 5, on a dual p90 HP vectra, Intel Neptune chipset, 40
MB ram. I hear the new 2.1.x kernels
24 matches
Mail list logo
