Hi all,
I have a Redhat v9 box that is incapable of resolving certain specific
DNS addresses, but it can resolve others. Addresses that work:
www.google.com
www.is.co.za
www.anazi.co.za
Addresses that do not work:
www.yahoo.com
www.apple.com
An attempt to resolve the packet looks like this:
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 9:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DNS problems from the twilight zone
Hi all,
I have a Redhat v9 box that is incapable of resolving certain specific
DNS addresses, but it can resolve others. Addresses that work:
www.google.com
www.is.co.za
their queries specifically?
Regards,
Graham
--
-Original Message-
From: Graham Leggett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 9:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DNS problems from the twilight zone
Hi all,
I have a Redhat v9 box that is incapable of resolving certain
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 09:10, Graham Leggett wrote:
Hi all,
I have a Redhat v9 box that is incapable of resolving certain specific
DNS addresses, but it can resolve others. Addresses that work:
www.google.com
www.is.co.za
www.anazi.co.za
I would think that your problem is with your NS
David Hart wrote:
I would think that your problem is with your NS provider (The Internet Solution).
Have you tried a caching name server with the ISP as backup?
I have tried about 5 or 6 different nameservers, some on the ISP's
network, some on external networks. As a control, I have run the
At 01:32 6/09/2003, you wrote:
Jason Staudenmayer wrote:
Sounds like a bad routing table. Like the resolve file is set right but the
return route for the packets is bad. Had something similar with a win2k box
and Pcanywhere. It would receive the first packet but couldn't return them.
A bad
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 09:42, Graham Leggett wrote:
David Hart wrote:
I would think that your problem is with your NS provider (The Internet Solution).
Have you tried a caching name server with the ISP as backup?
I have tried about 5 or 6 different nameservers, some on the ISP's
Steve Phillips wrote:
Anybody heard of Akadns before? Anyone know why a Redhat v9 box cannot
resolve their queries specifically?
This is Akamai - a world wide distributed web system that runs primarily
via DNS and some fancy layer4 routing.
I figured that it might be Akamai, but whois linked
At 02:10 6/09/2003, you wrote:
Steve Phillips wrote:
Anybody heard of Akadns before? Anyone know why a Redhat v9 box cannot
resolve their queries specifically?
This is Akamai - a world wide distributed web system that runs primarily
via DNS and some fancy layer4 routing.
I figured that it might