On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Christian Campbell wrote:
Thanks for the help. I have the changes made in the sendmail.mc file, and
ran a make -c /etc/mail. Unfortunately, it's still not working. Here is a
snip from my maillog:
Aug 7 12:01:26 atlas sendmail[25486]: h77G1Nsg025486:
Thanks for the help. I have the changes made in the sendmail.mc file, and
ran a make -c /etc/mail. Unfortunately, it's still not working. Here is a
snip from my maillog:
Aug 7 12:01:26 atlas sendmail[25486]: h77G1Nsg025486: ruleset=check_rcpt,
arg1=[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Recently I turned on SMTP AUTH, and everything was working well. Sendmail
would relay mail for authenticated users using SASL. A few days ago,
users
were unable to send mail anymore using SASL. Outlook Express (and other
various mail clients) would not authenticate.
If I telnet to port
you have to edit /etc/sysconfig/mail and set:
SMTPD_LISTEN_REMOTE=yes
If not it only respons to localhost 25.
---
Trond
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29. juli 2003 10:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: smtp not
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 01:30:15PM +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
telnet: connect to address 192.168.0.222: Connection refused
and the same message appears when I try to connect from the mail server itself
also.
There is no firewall enabled. Do I need to add anything or change
anything
Read your /etc/mail/sendmail.mc file and you'll see what's happening.
Sendmail only listens to localhost by default.
JAV
-- Original Message ---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 13:30:15 +0530
Subject: smtp not responding
Hi all,
In the
on the machine you are trying to send the mail through, you need to add
your ip/hostname+domain in to /etc/mail/relay-domains and restart
sendmail
On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 01:27, Daryl Hunt wrote:
I used one of the machines on a different IP and with it's own Domain Name
to send a message
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Daryl Hunt wrote:
Daryl,
I used one of the machines on a different IP and with it's own Domain Name
to send a message through the relay on the Nix Machine. Here is the error
message.
The message could not be sent because one of the recipients was rejected by
the
- Original Message -
From: John McKinney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 2:55 AM
Subject: Re: SMTP Blocking on port 25
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Daryl Hunt wrote:
Daryl,
I noticed several replies and haven't really been keeping up with the
thread
Are you trying this from the console of your linux box, or from a client
somewhere else? Those look like errors while trying to use an external
client and imap or pop. I got the same thing before I set up sasl auth.
It was a pain, but it allowed me to relay for authorized users without
opening
- Original Message -
From: Benjamin J. Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 8:17 PM
Subject: Re: SMTP Blocking on port 25
Are you trying this from the console of your linux box, or from a client
somewhere else? Those look like errors while
I am using MailScanner with antivir from h+bedv (for free in private
use) and spamssassin.
MailScanner can also handle more than one virus scanner. That´s cool.
Spamassassin is tuneable and very good in getting rid of spam.
Regards
Cornelius
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We need to set up an SMTP
]
Sent by: cc:
redhat-list-adminSubject: Re: SMTP scanning software?
@redhat.com
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 05:29:24PM -0400, Gerry Doris wrote:
MailScanner supports over a dozen commercial virus scanners as well as a
few open source ones. I'm using F-PROT (commercial) and ClamAV (open
source) together and am not aware of any virus' that have slipped through.
Serious users
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 05:29:24PM -0400, Gerry Doris wrote:
MailScanner supports over a dozen commercial virus scanners as well as a
few open source ones. I'm using F-PROT (commercial) and ClamAV (open
source) together and am not aware of any virus' that have slipped
through.
Serious users
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 09:57, Ed Wilts wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 05:29:24PM -0400, Gerry Doris wrote:
MailScanner supports over a dozen commercial virus scanners as well as a
few open source ones. I'm using F-PROT (commercial) and ClamAV (open
source) together and am not aware of any
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 11:13:59AM -0400, Gerry Doris wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 05:29:24PM -0400, Gerry Doris wrote:
I wrote:
I installed MailScanner and f-prot last night and have a quicky
question. I'm getting an hourly message in my messages file that reads:
root: Unknown fatal
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 11:13:59AM -0400, Gerry Doris wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 05:29:24PM -0400, Gerry Doris wrote:
I wrote:
I installed MailScanner and f-prot last night and have a quicky
question. I'm getting an hourly message in my messages file that
reads:
root: Unknown
10:43:09 -0500
From: Ed Wilts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SMTP scanning software?
Organization: (ewilts)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 11:13:59AM -0400, Gerry Doris wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 05:29:24PM -0400, Gerry Doris wrote:
I wrote:
I
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 12:15:08PM -0400, Gerry Doris wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 11:13:59AM -0400, Gerry Doris wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 05:29:24PM -0400, Gerry Doris wrote:
I wrote:
I installed MailScanner and f-prot last night and have a quicky
question. I'm getting an
MailScanner installed /etc/cron.hourly/update_virus_scripts
This calls /usr/sbin/update_virus_scanners. This in turn calls
f-prot-autoupdate and that's where the problem is.
I'm hearing from you that it's working without any issues. I'm seeing
from other people that they just use the
Well you can use the combination of Sophie, Sophos and Exiscan with the Exim
mail system, works very nicely at the U of L.
See http://www.exim.org, http://www.sophos.com for starters.
Cheers,
Aly.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We need to set up an SMTP scanning server. I've been looking at /
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We need to set up an SMTP scanning server. I've been looking at / getting
prices for Windows NT-based solutions such as McAfee's WebShield SMTP.
Does anyone know of any Linux-based (preferably Redhat) equivalents?
Tom Hightower
Solutions, Inc
]
Sent by: cc:
redhat-list-adminSubject: Re: SMTP scanning software
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bearing in mind that I'm fairly new to all things Linux
I have a total of 10 mail servers for which I need to provide a higher
level of email protection. 9 of them are hosted on one Lotus Domino server
(running on a Windows NT 4.0 server),
[snip]
try...
define(`confAUTH_OPTIONS', `A')dnl
I beleive the p (in your example) disables plain text authentication.
Steve Cowles
[snip]
Thanks for the tip. I tried this and still get the same error. I dont
think the request is even getting to my mail server somehow.
--
redhat-list
On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 17:04, Richard Humphrey wrote:
Sorry for the long post but I am really trying to understand why this
isnt working. I have verified with 2 techs at my ISP that they are not
blocking any ports. (wanted to clear that up right away)
I have a machine set up at home (RedHat 8
-Original Message-
From: Richard Humphrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 4:04 PM
To: RedHat
Subject: SMTP Auth
define(`confPRIVACY_FLAGS',
`authwarnings,novrfy,noexpn,restrictqrun')dnl
define(`confAUTH_OPTIONS', `A p y')dnl
TRUST_AUTH_MECH(`LOGIN
Hi Andy,
You might have the problem of forged spam E-mails. Please refer to the following
article,
http://pobox.com/valid1.html
The mails don't use any relay but using the normal SMTP procedure instead ( a mail
server will return any mail back if the receiver of the mail is
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Andy Kirk wrote:
I was until about an hour confident that my SMTP relay was secure. At that
time, I received a spam email promoting 1,000,000 email address, that
appears to have been sent from my mail server. At least, the From says
[EMAIL PROTECTED], and from looking
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Andy Kirk wrote:
snip...
3) Again, if the problem is a forged From field, these not really an easy
solution to stop it. You can try to push the IETF to promote digital
signature checking as a revised SMTP standard but that
On 10-Jan-2003/18:34 -0800, Todd A. Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you must allow relaying for some reason, restrict it to known hosts
and/or IP's, and enable pop-before-smtp if possible.
[snip]
POP-Before-SMTP is a kludge that was Good Enough while clients and servers
that support SMTP AUTH
Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
Lots of MTAs still don't support it without patches (e.g. qmail). So it's
not exactly a universal solution, but it's a good one to use if you have
the option.
1 MTA, ie. qmail, is hardly lots of MTAs. On the contrary, most modern
SMTP servers support SMTP AUTH. The list
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Andy Kirk wrote:
1. Is it possible for someone to basically use my relay to send mail to my
domain
Why would they want to? The point of using a relay is to deliver to a
third-party destination.
3. Is there anyway to stop it, whilst still allowing email destined for
my
It would help to know what system you want to try this with I mean e.g
Sendmail, postfix, exim ?? on what OS from RH ??
Have you looked at LDAP, NIS is a dying system.
Aly.
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 05:30, Hugo Tavares wrote:
Greetings
As anyone configured sendmail with SMTP
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 09:45:35AM -0500, James Pifer wrote:
I have it all installed, mostly with defaults, but spam still seems to
be getting through. I've received 6 spam messages since last night. How
can I tell if its working at all? /var/log/maillog doesn't seem to show
me much except
On Thursday, November 14, 2002, at 07:17 AM, Kevin MacNeil wrote:
seems like the good old days before Canter Siegal and all of their
Now there's a couple of names I haven't heard in a lng time.
Makes me all misty thinking of ye olden days, and the green card
lottery.
Yay. :)
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 07:17:43AM -0500, Kevin MacNeil wrote:
Have a look at the email headers. Do you see anything like the
following? If so, spamassassin is doing its job and you're most of the
way there.
Hmmm, how interesting. I sent a bunch of email headers within the
previous email
On 13 Nov 2002, James Pifer wrote:
I hope people on this list don't mind me asking another question about
Mailscanner with Sendmail/f-prot/SpamAssassin. I know MailScanner has a
forum, but this is by far the place with the most knowledge. I've also
looked at the FAQ on MailScanner's site.
-Original Message-
From: James Pifer
Subject: SMTP/AV/Spam Follow-Up
I can send mail from the local machine, just not from any
clients. Using webmin if I go into the sendmail configuration,
user mailboxes, and compose a message from root, it gets sent ok.
Sounds like your
My understanding is that the typical configuration, now, for Sendmail, is
to only answer on the localhost address, until it's reconfigured to answer
on other or all IPs on the system.
On 12 Nov 2002, James Pifer wrote:
I appreciate all the responses I have received. They have been extremely
Steve,
Thanks. That fixed it. I appreciate the instructions.
I do have a new problem you might be able to help me with. I seem to
have a routing problem. Here's the situation. I'm attempting to test
MailScanner using spam and antivirus. So I installed another Linux
machine and have all of that
-Original Message-
From: James Pifer
Subject: RE: SMTP/AV/Spam Follow-Up
Steve,
Thanks. That fixed it. I appreciate the instructions.
I do have a new problem you might be able to help me with. I seem to
have a routing problem. Here's the situation. I'm attempting to test
You need to add the domain name(s) to /etc/mail/sendmail.cw on the
192.168.1.6 box, so that it knows it's supposed to accept mail for that
domain.
On 12 Nov 2002, James Pifer wrote:
Steve,
Thanks. That fixed it. I appreciate the instructions.
I do have a new problem you might be able
for your help.
James
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 13:34, Cowles, Steve wrote:
-Original Message-
From: James Pifer
Subject: RE: SMTP/AV/Spam Follow-Up
Steve,
Thanks. That fixed it. I appreciate the instructions.
I do have a new problem you might be able to help me with. I
On 11 Nov 2002, James Pifer wrote:
I company I do some work for is looking at spending a whole lot of money
on a product from sendmail.com that offers an smtp gateway with spam
filtering and anti-virus.
I'm thinking they could save a lot of money by doing it themselves using
Redhat. I've
On 11 Nov 2002, James Pifer wrote:
I company I do some work for is looking at spending a whole lot of money
on a product from sendmail.com that offers an smtp gateway with spam
filtering and anti-virus.
I'm thinking they could save a lot of money by doing it themselves using
Redhat. I've
-Original Message-
From: James Pifer
Subject: SMTP Gateway with Spam Filters and AntiVirus
I company I do some work for is looking at spending a whole
lot of money on a product from sendmail.com that offers an
smtp gateway with spam filtering and anti-virus.
I'm thinking
James - I'm using MailScanner, a free program that scans mail for spam and
some viruses and/or uses your choice of virus-scanning software to scan for
viruses (my choice being f-prot). The latest version of MailScanner is a
breeze to install on RH 7.3. It works with Sendmail or Exim. F-prot is
- Original Message -
From: James Pifer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: redhat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 8:15 PM
Subject: SMTP Gateway with Spam Filters and AntiVirus
I company I do some work for is looking at spending a whole lot of money
on a product from sendmail.com
On 11 Nov 2002, James Pifer wrote:
I company I do some work for is looking at spending a whole lot of money
on a product from sendmail.com that offers an smtp gateway with spam
filtering and anti-virus.
I'm thinking they could save a lot of money by doing it themselves using
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 04:58:48PM -0500, Ed Schernau wrote:
PS. Whoever said that procmail needs sendmail was talking crap. I run
it with qmail here and there are zero issues.
I believe the comment was that procmail needed an MTA more than it
needed sendmail. The original poster wanted to
On 11 Nov 2002, Gordon Messmer wrote:
2) I'm also thinking they should use DNSBL so I guess that means using
rblcheck? Would this then be using Sendmail, Procmail, AND rblcheck?
Courier MTA supports DNS black hole lists natively, without external
software. It works well.
So do
I could be wrong, but you seems to use your own host like a mailserver.
why not setting your mail client to connect directly to the mail hub?
means: set the outgoing mail server to the mail hub, not to your own pc.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
--- Michael Cortes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently ran up2date on my RH7.1 and RH7.3 server. I just found
out that I cannot send mail out via smtp from my windoz mail program.
I have also noticed that my server is refusing all mail. For example:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Deferred:
session.
Best Regards,
Tim Kehres
International Messaging Associates
http://www.ima.com
- Original Message -
From: Al Sparks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 6:29 AM
Subject: Re: SMTP trouble
--- Michael Cortes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
some questions on this (thanks for doing this, by the way).
first of all, I'm running Red Hat Linux 7.3, pretty much out of the box
(plus eratta).
On 29-Jan-02 Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
snip.
note that the AUTH line is not there.
any hints ?
You did restart the sendmail daemon,
some questions on this (thanks for doing this, by the way).
first of all, I'm running Red Hat Linux 7.3, pretty much out of the box (plus
eratta).
On 29-Jan-02 Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
All:
The following are basic instructions on enabling SMTP AUTH on a late-model
server. These instructions
Michael George wrote:
Hello!
SNIP
Currently, I run sendmail on that server. Mostly because that's what I've
used at home and I've become used to the sendmail-cf configuration tools that
come w/ Red Hat. If qmail does what we want, I'll switch in a heartbeat...
IMO qmail would be the
Hello Michael,
Thursday, May 30, 2002, 8:39:08 AM, you textually orated:
snip
MG Anyway, with sendmail I think I can tell it to relay any mail from the local
MG machine to the outside world and then tell it to relay any mail from our
MG office network to the outside world (by allowing relaying
On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 05:39, Michael George wrote:
Is there a way to have authentication and then doing an SMTP relay in
sendmail? in qmail? In another SMTP server?
I recommend using Courier MTA: http://www.courier-mta.org/
Setup is very easy, you can use rpm packages from
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 06:47:07PM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
define(`confAUTH_OPTIONS', `A')dnl
TRUST_AUTH_MECH(`DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 LOGIN PLAIN')dnl
define(`confAUTH_MECHANISMS', `DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 LOGIN PLAIN')dnl
This works just fine and authenticates a user against a system
On Tue, 2002-05-21 at 06:35, Bradley Glonka wrote:
define(`confAUTH_OPTIONS', `A')dnl
TRUST_AUTH_MECH(`DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 LOGIN PLAIN')dnl
define(`confAUTH_MECHANISMS', `DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 LOGIN PLAIN')dnl
This works just fine and authenticates a user against a system account.
Can
I have a few questions of my own...
why does redhat install sendmail by default?
Should you not install a mta as an optional extra?
why does redhat not install qmail as default...this is much better than
sendmail?
ross (waiting for flames) cooney
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ross Cooney wrote:
Short answers (preemptive flame?) ...
why does redhat install sendmail by default?
Should you not install a mta as an optional extra?
Having an MTA present and running is probably not necessary, but it is
helpful, and gives the
At 4/10/2002 07:43 PM +0100, you wrote:
why does redhat not install qmail as default...this is much better than
sendmail?
Try not to state A is much better than B unless you are a certified
global expert on the subject; you'll find that 99% of the time the reason
things are done is simply that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
Also, let's keep this thread to SMTP AUTH for the moment, shall we? Raise
this issue as a separate thread so we can all keep our head in order. It's
easier that way... just write a new message with a different subject like
At 4/10/2002 01:59 PM -0700, you wrote:
Yes, history will show that when Rodolfo is way off topic, he at least
has the decency to announce it with a bold subject line:
http://www.prairienet.org/library/redhat/redhat-list/2001/06/msg00682.php
roaring in laughter Gee thanks, David; use my past
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Martín Marqués wrote:
I have configured the MTA to only send mails, but I would like to have
something lighter to do this job then an MTA server (postfix, qmail,
sendmail), just because those servers have more importante things to do
(database servers, web servers,
On Lun 18 Feb 2002 10:41, you wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Martín Marqués wrote:
I have configured the MTA to only send mails, but I would like to have
something lighter to do this job then an MTA server (postfix, qmail,
sendmail), just because those servers have more importante things to
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Martín Marqués wrote:
On Lun 18 Feb 2002 10:41, you wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Martín Marqués wrote:
I have configured the MTA to only send mails, but I would like to have
something lighter to do this job then an MTA server (postfix, qmail,
sendmail), just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martín Marqués wrote:
I was wondering if there is some sort of smtp client (inteligent) that I can
put on the servers that are not the MTA of our net.
Especifically, I want cron mails to be sent, and some other administrative
mails to be sent from
Or he could use sendmail in non-daemon mode All the web servers and
all of the desktops are configured so that sendmail does not run in daemon
mode; but the machines can still send mail by making calls to
sendmail. They just cannot receive mail in this config.
- rick warner
On Mon, 18
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rick Warner wrote:
I was wondering if there is some sort of smtp client (inteligent) that I can
put on the servers that are not the MTA of our net.
Especifically, I want cron mails to be sent, and some other administrative
mails to be sent
Hello Martin,
As far as I know, sendmail will only take system resources while sending the
mail. You don't have to run it in deamon mode. I use commands like :
echo | mutt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Iam sure that you can use this and replace the echo with cat textfile.txt or
what ever
Cheers,
Go to http://www.qmail.org to find out lots of qmail documentation
including a link that will point you to the mailing list. I recommend
"Life with qmail" by Dave Sill.
As far as your problems sending mail, qmail doesnt relay by default
(which is a good thing).
If youre running the tcpserver
On Sat, 7 Apr 2001, at 08:50 (GMT -0700), biniam sahlezghi wrote:
I have a problem
I can't send mail otside of my domain it says mail
rejecyed error SMTP 550. But still I am recieving mail
but not sending from workstation but I can send from
the server.When I check the nslookup it says
On Sat, 7 Apr 2001, biniam sahlezghi wrote:
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2001 08:50:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: biniam sahlezghi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SMTP error and NSLOOKUP
I have a problem
I can't send mail otside of my domain it says mail
rejecyed
I do have this problem b4 with my RedHat 6.2 and sendmail-8.9.3-20.
is really took 30 sec for connection...
But I dunno whether it is helpful for u???
Anyway, what I did is just change parameter in sendmail.cf as below:
from
O Timeout.ident=30s
to
O Timeout.ident=0s
It solved my problem, hope
Check your reverse dns.
Regards,
Marc
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 January 2001 11:40
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Holger Greindl
Subject: smtp-connect delays about 30 seconds
Hi,
sorry if this kind of problem has been posted before,
On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, John N. Alegre wrote:
An error occurred while sending mail.
The mail server responded:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ... Relaying denied
Please check the message recipients and try again.
Now when sending mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the machine running
sendmail this address
Reply to message from John N. Alegre on Fri, 24 Nov 2000, 19:39 -0600:
Hi John,
I am just a beginner to Linux, so perhaps I shouldn't dare trying to give
hints how to fix a problem like this -- my apologies in anticipation
therefore ...
[ ... ]
On the Macintosh I am trying to send mail
"jna" == John N Alegre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
jna An error occurred while sending mail.
jna The mail server responded:
jna[EMAIL PROTECTED] ... Relaying denied
jna Please check the message recipients and try again.
jna Now when sending mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the machine running
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Raghuveera Nanchariah Chalasani wrote:
Hi,
I am writing a SMTP server and I am having problems with figuring out various
scenarios. I am implementing the version of SMTP as described in RFC 822. I am
curious if there is any free source code that I can look up for
I am assuming your using sendmail? If so what does /var/log/maillog have to
say when a mac tries to send a message.
Eddie Strohmier
- Original Message -
From: "Meghan Madel" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 1:35 PM
Subject: smtp
I seemed to
/var/log/mail.log says:
Date, time, etc. ruleset=check_rcpt, arg1=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
relay=jpotter [10.0.0.29], reject=550 5.7.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] relaying
denied
Thanks, Meg
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Eddie Strohmier wrote:
I am assuming your using sendmail? If so what does /var/log/maillog have
I believe that 550 is (recipient) user unknown..
Doug
-Original Message-
From: Meghan Madel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 3:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: smtp
/var/log/mail.log says:
Date, time, etc. ruleset=check_rcpt, arg1=[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Meghan Madel wrote:
/var/log/mail.log says:
Date, time, etc. ruleset=check_rcpt, arg1=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
relay=jpotter [10.0.0.29], reject=550 5.7.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] relaying
denied
Thanks, Meg
You have to tell sendmail that it is ok to accept mail from the Macs.
Martin Brown wrote:
I've been using 'fetchmail' to dl my mail to my rh6.1 system. I've never
had any problem until a few days ago, and then from time-to-time I started
getting the following, and slowly more and more often even though
alternately fetchmail would work. Now, it's all errors,
Martin Brown wrote:
I've been using 'fetchmail' to dl my mail to my rh6.1 system. I've never
[...]
[mjbjr@localhost mjbjr]$ fetchmail
7 messages for mjbjr at shell9.ba.best.com (16465 octets).
reading message 1 of 7 (579 octets) fetchmail: retained
reading message 2 of 7 (2017 octets)
%- Ok. Now I have Lotus Notes for Linux (but haven't installed it, but will
%- do soon).
%- I want to try to build some system on it and I know that it has utility
%- called "cc:Mail MTA" and "SMTP MTA", which, in fact, are interface
%- between Lotus mail system and cc:Mail and Internet mail.
on 21/4/2000 1:39 AM, psv shot down the bitstream:
psv wrote:
Edward Marczak wrote:
on 20/4/2000 12:36 AM, psv shot down the bitstream:
Hi!
Is it possible? If yes, how?
You need to run a Lotus or third party product to do this. Lotus makes
'Link to SMTP', IMA
Charles Galpin wrote:
This is not an offer to do this, but I'd like to understnad what the
problem is.
Can you describe in more detail what kind of email interpreting you are
interested in doing, and when?
Hi, Charles!
Ok. Now I have Lotus Notes for Linux (but haven't installed it, but
This is not an offer to do this, but I'd like to understnad what the
problem is.
Can you describe in more detail what kind of email interpreting you are
interested in doing, and when?
charles
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, psv wrote:
psv wrote:
Edward Marczak wrote:
on 20/4/2000 12:36 AM,
on 20/4/2000 12:36 AM, psv shot down the bitstream:
Hi!
Is it possible? If yes, how?
You need to run a Lotus or third party product to do this. Lotus makes
'Link to SMTP', IMA (http://www.ima.com/product/gwprod.html) and Johnson
Consulting (http://www.jconsult.com) have info on other
Edward Marczak wrote:
on 20/4/2000 12:36 AM, psv shot down the bitstream:
Hi!
Is it possible? If yes, how?
You need to run a Lotus or third party product to do this. Lotus makes
'Link to SMTP', IMA (http://www.ima.com/product/gwprod.html) and Johnson
Consulting
psv wrote:
Edward Marczak wrote:
on 20/4/2000 12:36 AM, psv shot down the bitstream:
Hi!
Is it possible? If yes, how?
You need to run a Lotus or third party product to do this. Lotus makes
'Link to SMTP', IMA (http://www.ima.com/product/gwprod.html) and Johnson
On Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 01:42:14PM -0500, Craig Zody wrote:
Hello all again!
I'd like to thank everyone for pointing me to the Webaliser software to
analuse my webserver's log files.
I was wondering if anyone knows of anything similar that will analyse the
maillogs? Or anything that will
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, tom minchin wrote:
I used 'mreport' (find it on freshmeat.net) - it's ok - uses a lot of RAM
for large logfiles though.
Yeah, like webalizer doesn't!! :-)
umm, yummm, RAM. :-)
cheers,
Hossein
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the
Hi everyone!
noticed the thread and was hoping i could get some pointers:')
Just finished reading SENDMAIL cover to cover and am planning to set up
a double mail server arrangement with one mailer for outside a firewall
that the local users have their outgoing mail relayed to. Is their
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
