Re: SECURITY: new XFree86 packages now available

1998-06-17 Thread argathin
Dave Reed writes: From: Ron Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] I checked what version of PAM I'm using since I am using XFree86 3.3.2 (see below) but I am using RH5.0. What is the reason for not using this version with 4.2? Is it a glibc thing? [root@ozenfant /tmp]# rpm -qvi pam Name

[ewt@redhat.com: Re: SECURITY: new XFree86 packages now available]

1998-06-10 Thread Dave Reed
of forwarded message --- Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Authentication-Warning: mercury.redhat.com: ewt owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 9 Jun 1998 21:43:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Erik Troan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Dave Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SECURITY: new XFree86 packages now available Just

Re: SECURITY: new XFree86 packages now available

1998-06-09 Thread Dave Reed
Is it just me or are other 4.2 users having problems updating to the new XFree86 rpms? I sent the following to this list on Friday in response to Erik's announcement of the new rpms and cc'ed Erik on it, but have not heard anything. I also filled out a bug report on the new bug reporting web

Re: SECURITY: new XFree86 packages now available

1998-06-05 Thread Dave Reed
From: Erik Troan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Major security holes have been found in the X libraries and xterm, which allow local users access to the root user. All Red Hat 4.x and 5.x systems which X-Windows installed should update their systems. Packages for the SPARC

Re: SECURITY: new XFree86 packages now available

1998-06-05 Thread Ron Golan
I checked what version of PAM I'm using since I am using XFree86 3.3.2 (see below) but I am using RH5.0. What is the reason for not using this version with 4.2? Is it a glibc thing? [root@ozenfant /tmp]# rpm -qvi pam Name: pam Distribution: Hurricane Version

Re: SECURITY: new XFree86 packages now available

1998-06-05 Thread Dave Reed
From: Ron Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] I checked what version of PAM I'm using since I am using XFree86 3.3.2 (see below) but I am using RH5.0. What is the reason for not using this version with 4.2? Is it a glibc thing? [root@ozenfant /tmp]# rpm -qvi pam Name: pam