Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis

2020-09-24 Thread Gould, James
The RDAP Profile is dependent on the RFC, so I wouldn't create a circular dependency. My recommendation is to take the lessons learned in implementing the RFC and provide guidance on how to handle it in the RFC directly. -- JG James Gould Fellow Engineer jgo...@verisign.com

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis

2020-09-24 Thread Jasdip Singh
Hello Scott, James. Seems if the RDAP profile for the DNRs (https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/rdap-operational-profile-2016-07-26-en) could clarify this, the spec could be left as-is. Jasdip On 9/24/20, 12:30 PM, "regext on behalf of Hollenbeck, Scott" wrote: > -Original

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis

2020-09-24 Thread Jasdip Singh
Hello Scott, James. One thought is if it could be in the RDAP profile doc for the DNRs (https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/rdap-operational-profile-2016-07-26-en). That way no need to update the spec. Jasdip On 9/24/20, 12:31 PM, "regext on behalf of Hollenbeck, Scott" wrote: >

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis

2020-09-24 Thread Hollenbeck, Scott
> -Original Message- > From: Gould, James > Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 2:27 PM > To: Hollenbeck, Scott ; i...@antoin.nl; > regext@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis > > Scott, > > Yes, lumping the registrar object with the contact

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis

2020-09-24 Thread Hollenbeck, Scott
> -Original Message- > From: regext On Behalf Of Gould, James > Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2020 10:55 AM > To: i...@antoin.nl; regext@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis > > I have one item to bring up with draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis,

Re: [regext] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2020-09-24 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi Roman, thanks a lot for your quick reply.  I can't report entirely here the edits involving Section 2.3.1 and Appendix A. I'll publish a new version as soon as possible. Please let me know if there is something that still doesn't work for you. Thanks again for your feedback, Mario Il

Re: [regext] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2020-09-24 Thread Roman Danyliw
Hi Mario! > -Original Message- > From: Mario Loffredo > Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2020 10:56 AM > To: Roman Danyliw ; The IESG > Cc: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-pag...@ietf.org; > regext-cha...@ietf.org; > regext@ietf.org; Tom Harrison > Subject: Re: Roman Danyliw's Discuss

Re: [regext] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2020-09-24 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi Roman, thanks a lot for your review. Please find my comments inline. Il 23/09/2020 15:33, Roman Danyliw via Datatracker ha scritto: Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging-17: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject

[regext] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging-17: (with COMMENT)

2020-09-24 Thread Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging-17: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)