Re: [regext] [Ext] Re: WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-04

I reviewed version 05, and I think it is ready for publication. Regards, Gustavo On 12/13/21, 5:22 AM, "regext on behalf of Mario Loffredo" wrote: +1 Mario Il 06/12/2021 14:45, Antoin Verschuren ha scritto: > Dear Working Group, > > The authors of the following worki

Re: [regext] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-jscontact-04.txt

Hi. +1 for this doc being on standards track. Jasdip From: regext on behalf of Antoin Verschuren Date: Monday, December 13, 2021 at 10:10 AM To: "regext@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [regext] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-jscontact-04.txt Hi All, I’m glad that my bad phrasi

Re: [regext] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-jscontact-04.txt

Hi All, I’m glad that my bad phrasing at least got some action into this discussion. I didn’t mean to say that we can’t have 2 standards, but we should at least have clarity on the status of this document. Because the original document title was "jcard-deprecation

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-04

+1 Mario Il 06/12/2021 14:45, Antoin Verschuren ha scritto: Dear Working Group, The authors of the following working group document have indicated that it is believed to be ready for submission to the IESG for publication as a standards track document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-04

> -Original Message- > From: Gould, James > Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2021 11:59 AM > To: Hollenbeck, Scott ; > ietf=40antoin...@dmarc.ietf.org ; regext@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp- > eai-04 > > Caution: This email originated from o