Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-datadictionary-03

2023-02-13 Thread Jasdip Singh
Hello Heather, Steve, Overall, this doc should prove useful to anyone embarking on creating or evolving a registration protocol. While reviewing the latest draft, had some observations/feedback (sorry for the delay): Unless this doc, as-is, is intended for just the DNRs (Domain Name Registries

Re: [regext] Call for agenda items IETF 116

2023-02-13 Thread Keathley, Daniel
Hi Jim, Antoin, I'd like to request a 5-10 minute slot to introduce the RDAP versioning extension (draft-gould-regext-rdap-versioning). I will be attending virtually. Let me know if you need any further information. Thanks, --Dan On 2/13/23, 9:18 AM, "regext on behalf of Antoin Verschuren"

[regext] Call for agenda items IETF 116

2023-02-13 Thread Antoin Verschuren
Hi All, Ii’s time to think about agenda items for IETF 116. Jim and I requested an hour time slot, same as last IETF 115 meeting. So if you intend to request for a presentation, please let the chairs know. Regards, Jim and Antoin ___ regext mailing

Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-datadictionary-03

2023-02-13 Thread James Galvin
This is a reminder to please indicate your support or no objection to the publication of this document. The Document Shepherd should take note that the WGLC for this document was noted on the DNSOP mailing list. Thanks to Scott Hollenbeck for doing this and making it relevant for them to consi