Re: [regext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type-00.txt

> The only problem is that RDAP is specifically intended to use the > features of HTTP. See Section 3 of RFC 7480. RDAP also currently > defines the use of HTTP headers, as do many REST protocols. In fact, > the idea behind RDAP-X is not novel as it was inspired by the W3C's > ActivityPub protocol

Re: [regext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type-00.txt

On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 9:01 AM Gould, James wrote: > > JG - I'm not sure where the "search all RDAP servers" use case is coming > from. The RDAP RFCs and extensions provide bootstrapping and query features > (lookup and search) that clients can use to query individual RDAP servers. Let me

Re: [regext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type-00.txt

Andy, I provide feedback embedded below. -- JG James Gould Fellow Engineer jgo...@verisign.com 703-948-3271 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 Verisign.com On 7/24/23, 5:17 PM, "Andrew Newton" mailto:a...@hxr.us>> wrote: Caution: This email originated

Re: [regext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type-00.txt

Hi James, Thanks for the review. My response is in-line. On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 11:10 AM Gould, James wrote: > > Are you saying that RDAP cannot use query parameters due to the cases that > you present in the draft? Not at all. The appendix in the draft points out why client capabilities

Re: [regext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type-00.txt

Andy, In reviewing draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type-00 ahead of the REXEXT meeting tomorrow, I have the following feedback: 1. Are you saying that RDAP cannot use query parameters due to the cases that you present in the draft? 2. What should be done with the use of query

Re: [regext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type-00.txt

On 7/17/23, 3:47 PM, "Pawel Kowalik" mailto:kowa...@denic.de>> wrote: Am 17.07.2023 um 17:32 schrieb Jasdip Singh mailto:jasd...@arin.net>>: > > [JS] This is a fair point, Pawel. Would you suggest considering the latter > method (query parameters) as well, given it may not survive a redirect?

Re: [regext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type-00.txt

Hi, > Am 17.07.2023 um 17:32 schrieb Jasdip Singh : > > [JS] This is a fair point, Pawel. Would you suggest considering the latter > method (query parameters) as well, given it may not survive a redirect? Not really. Too much hassle and complexity just to support a de facto non RDAP client.

Re: [regext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type-00.txt

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 11:01 AM kowa...@denic.de wrote: > > > [SAH] It's important to support *all* types of clients if possible. > > Anything less can lead to inconsistent user experiences, and that's bad for > > RDAP's long-term viability. I hope this is meant to surround "all types" with

Re: [regext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type-00.txt

On 7/17/23, 11:01 AM, "regext on behalf of kowa...@denic.de " mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of kowa...@denic.de > wrote: Am 17.07.23 um 13:36 schrieb Hollenbeck, Scott: > >> As an aside note of the considerations at point 1, would

Re: [regext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type-00.txt

Hi, Am 17.07.23 um 13:36 schrieb Hollenbeck, Scott: As an aside note of the considerations at point 1, would like to know the current WG's opinion about how relevant is making an RDAP server easily accessible by a web browser. [SAH] It's important to support *all* types of clients if

Re: [regext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type-00.txt

Hi. On 7/17/23, 7:36 AM, "regext on behalf of Hollenbeck, Scott" mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of shollenbeck=40verisign@dmarc.ietf.org > wrote: > As an aside note of the considerations at point 1, would like to know > the current WG's

Re: [regext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type-00.txt

Il 17/07/2023 13:25, Andrew Newton ha scritto: Hi Mario, my responses are inline. On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 3:42 AM Mario Loffredo wrote: [ML] 1) In addition to Pawel's feedback, it seems to me that, unless you leverage a REST plugin, you are unable to use this extension through a web

Re: [regext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type-00.txt

> -Original Message- > From: regext On Behalf Of Mario Loffredo > Sent: Monday, July 17, 2023 3:39 AM > To: Andrew Newton ; Pawel Kowalik > Cc: regext@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft- > newton-regext-rdap-x-media-ty

Re: [regext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type-00.txt

Hi Mario, my responses are inline. On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 3:42 AM Mario Loffredo wrote: > > > > [ML] > > 1) In addition to Pawel's feedback, it seems to me that, unless you > leverage a REST plugin, you are unable to use this extension through a > web browser. The browser Javascript Fetch API

Re: [regext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type-00.txt

Hi Andy, please find my comments below. Il 12/07/2023 15:35, Andrew Newton ha scritto: Thanks for the review Pawel. My response is in-line: On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 2:41 AM Pawel Kowalik wrote: Hi Andy, Thanks for putting down this draft. A method for the client to signal supported or

Re: [regext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type-00.txt

Hi Andrew, Answers inline. Am 12.07.23 um 15:35 schrieb Andrew Newton: Another remark to the media type. RFC7480 specifies the usage of 'application/json', 'application/rdap+json' or both. Why the draft changes the requirement to require only 'application/rdap+json'? Is this change required

Re: [regext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type-00.txt

Thanks for the review Pawel. My response is in-line: On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 2:41 AM Pawel Kowalik wrote: > > Hi Andy, > > Thanks for putting down this draft. A method for the client to signal > supported or wanted extensions is really needed. > > A remark to the Section 3: I think all cases

Re: [regext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type-00.txt

Hi Andy, Thanks for putting down this draft. A method for the client to signal supported or wanted extensions is really needed. A remark to the Section 3: I think all cases should be covered by this section. Currently I'm missing, the case when the server would support more extensions than

Re: [regext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type-00.txt

I think you are correct. I did not notice it at first. :) But the points about how we describe aspects of JSON probably apply to everything RDAP related. -andy On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 12:31 PM Pawel Kowalik wrote: > > Hi Andy, > > Just to be sure - the comments refer to >

Re: [regext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type-00.txt

Hi Andy, Just to be sure - the comments refer to draft-newton-regext-rdap-extensions-00, not to draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type-00, right? I just got confused as the comment are in the thread of the latter. Kind Regards, Pawel Am 26.06.23 um 15:32 schrieb Gould, James: Andy,

Re: [regext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type-00.txt

James, Many thanks for the review. Your clarifications are reasonable to me. With regard to JSON names vs JSON members, the intent was to draw the distinction to the name vs the entire name and value. Regardless, I'll look into clarifying the concepts and some better explanatory text both and

Re: [regext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type-00.txt

Andy, Thanks for creating the draft, below is my feedback: 1. Section 2 “RDAP Extension Identifier” * It would be better to refer to JSON members instead of JSON attribute names to be more consistent with RFC 9083. * I would make it clear that the extension identifier can

[regext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type-00.txt

Hi all, Jasdip and I have put together a draft for a new RDAP media type. This allows clients to signal their supported extensions. By using a media type, this signaling survives redirects and is backward compatible with the RDAP RFCs and the currently deployed RDAP ecosystem. We even have some