Thanks, Gavin. Notes below.
> -Original Message-
> From: Gavin Brown
> Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2024 11:01 AM
> To: Hollenbeck, Scott
> Cc: regext@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Ext] [regext] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-
> delete-bcp-02.txt
>
> Caution: This email
Hi Scott,
> On 9 May 2024, at 20:33, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
[snip]
>> Section 6.1 describes what the document considers to be the Best Current
>> Practice. However, Section 6.2 then lists two "Best Proposed Practices", with
>> no context on how those relate to the practice in the preceding
From: Andrew Newton (andy)
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2024 9:37 AM
To: Hollenbeck, Scott ; gavin.br...@icann.org
Cc: regext@ietf.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Re: [Ext] Re: I-D Action:
draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp-02.txt
Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do
On 5/9/24 15:33, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
[SAH] The context is given in the Section title and the included back
references. They're proposed best practices. The back-referenced text
that describes each practice notes that they haven't been observed in
operation. We could add something like
(Resending due to IETF list delivery issues noted today)
Thanks, Gavin. Notes below.
> -Original Message-
> From: Gavin Brown
> Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2024 11:01 AM
> To: Hollenbeck, Scott
> Cc: regext@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Ext] [regext] Re: I-D Action:
Hi Scott,
My apologies that this feedback comes after you've requested WGLC! I had been
meaning to review the document properly and got caught out. I have a couple of
minor points and one somewhat less minor.
Full disclosure to the WG: I was an occasional participant in the SSAC group
from
