Re: [regext] creating invalid RDAP with redaction

2023-04-26 Thread Andrew Newton
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 3:16 PM Gould, James wrote: > > Andy, > > Yes, JCard certainly added complexity to the draft __. I believe a statement > can be broader than RFC 9083 to state something like the following at the > start of Section 3: > > "Redaction in RDAP can be handled in multiple ways

Re: [regext] creating invalid RDAP with redaction

2023-04-26 Thread Gould, James
Andy, Yes, JCard certainly added complexity to the draft __. I believe a statement can be broader than RFC 9083 to state something like the following at the start of Section 3: "Redaction in RDAP can be handled in multiple ways. The resulting redacted RDAP response MUST comply with the RDAP

[regext] creating invalid RDAP with redaction

2023-04-26 Thread Andrew Newton
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 9:27 AM Antoin Verschuren wrote: > > Please indicate your support or no objection for the publication of this > document by replying to this message on list (a simple “+1” is sufficient). I'd like to see this published, but have one issue. Perhaps this is in the document