Re: [regext] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-allocation-token-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2018-08-31 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
Hi James, On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 08:49:38PM +, Gould, James wrote: > Benjamin, > > > > Thanks again. My responses to your feedback is embedded below. Thanks for the extra comments, and uploading the -10. Sorry for the slow response; my travel schedule is pretty busy this month. The -10

Re: [regext] WGLC redux: REGEXT working group charter

2018-08-31 Thread Patrick Mevzek
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, at 21:31, James Galvin wrote: > Please respond to this message on the mailing list and indicate your > support or questions regarding this charter. "updates" should be "updated" I think. And I still think it is too broad, especially "Data formats for files" (which files

[regext] WGLC redux: REGEXT working group charter

2018-08-31 Thread James Galvin
An action to the chairs from our last meeting was to follow through on updating our charter to allow for the introduction of new work. You should recall that we had a proposed charter that was approved by the working group, which the Area Director presented to the IESG. Some questions came up

Re: [regext] WGLC redux: draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-12

2018-08-31 Thread Hollenbeck, Scott
> -Original Message- > From: regext On Behalf Of James Galvin > Sent: Friday, August 31, 2018 9:23 AM > To: Registration Protocols Extensions WG > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] WGLC redux: draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-12 > > We have previously completed a WGLC on this document. However, we

Re: [regext] WGLC redux: draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-12

2018-08-31 Thread Gould, James
I support publication of the document. — JG James Gould Distinguished Engineer jgo...@verisign.com 703-948-3271 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 Verisign.com On 8/31/18, 9:23 AM, "regext on behalf of James Galvin" wrote: We have previously completed

[regext] WGLC redux: draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-12

2018-08-31 Thread James Galvin
We have previously completed a WGLC on this document. However, we have made a few changes that are pretty close to being technically substantive. In the interest of full transparency your chairs think it would be best to have a short WGLC and make sure there are no additional concerns. Plea