Re: [regext] WGLC redux: REGEXT working group charter

2018-09-14 Thread Antoin Verschuren
Op 14 sep. 2018, om 17:14 heeft Jody Kolker het volgende geschreven: > > Since EPP and RDAP is included in this paragraph: > > << > The working group may also take on work to develop specifications that > describe the following types of information exchanged between entities > involved in Inter

Re: [regext] WGLC redux: REGEXT working group charter

2018-09-14 Thread Gould, James
AM To: Antoin Verschuren , Registration Protocols Extensions Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] WGLC redux: REGEXT working group charter Since EPP and RDAP is included in this paragraph: << The working group may also take on work to develop specifications that describe the following types of

Re: [regext] WGLC redux: REGEXT working group charter

2018-09-14 Thread Jody Kolker
Verschuren Sent: Friday, September 7, 2018 9:20 AM To: Registration Protocols Extensions Subject: Re: [regext] WGLC redux: REGEXT working group charter Alex,Patrick, Thank you for your comments. You made some good suggestions. I agree the scope of the bulletpoints are not that clear and not scoped n

Re: [regext] WGLC redux: REGEXT working group charter

2018-09-07 Thread Antoin Verschuren
Alex,Patrick, Thank you for your comments. You made some good suggestions. I agree the scope of the bulletpoints are not that clear and not scoped narrow enough for people not in this working group and not knowing which documents we discussed. How about changing the last paragraph with bulletpoi

Re: [regext] WGLC redux: REGEXT working group charter

2018-09-03 Thread Alexander Mayrhofer
Hello everyone, tl;dr - i do agree with all what Patrick said - more inline On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 10:46 PM Patrick Mevzek wrote: > And I still think it is too broad, especially "Data formats for files" > (which files? what data? why the format needs a specification and a working > group?). >

Re: [regext] WGLC redux: REGEXT working group charter

2018-08-31 Thread Patrick Mevzek
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, at 21:31, James Galvin wrote: > Please respond to this message on the mailing list and indicate your > support or questions regarding this charter. "updates" should be "updated" I think. And I still think it is too broad, especially "Data formats for files" (which files

[regext] WGLC redux: REGEXT working group charter

2018-08-31 Thread James Galvin
An action to the chairs from our last meeting was to follow through on updating our charter to allow for the introduction of new work. You should recall that we had a proposed charter that was approved by the working group, which the Area Director presented to the IESG. Some questions came up