Besides DNSSEC, I'm thinking of NS data and reseller data
kind regards
Pieter
> On 30 May 2018, at 11:10, Kal Feher wrote:
>
> Hi Pieter,
>
> could you elaborate on what objects you think might be modified? Are you
> thinking of anything other than DNSSEC material?
>
> delegation of epp to 3rd parties that are unknown to the registry does have
> some operational implications that need to be thought through. Although I
> suppose this group isnt regops.
>
>
> On 29/5/18 6:13 am, Pieter Vandepitte wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As I see discussions popping up now and then of 3rd party organisations
>> having to modify registry objects, wouldn't it be an idea to design
>> something like delegated EPP instead of implementing new protocols?
>> Something like: a registrar assigns a group to an object, then generates a
>> token for the group and shares it with a 3rd party. Could be more or less
>> complex, introducing users, etc.
>>
>> I'm probably reopening old discussions, but maybe worth thinking of.
>>
>> Pieter
>> ___
>> regext mailing list
>> regext@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
>
> --
> Kal Feher
> Melbourne, Australia
>
> ___
> regext mailing list
> regext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
