This WGLC ended last week.
Gustavo:
Before we can declare consensus and send this document to the IESG, the chairs
believe that the comments made by Roger and Scott should be attended to in a
new version of the document. Do you agree?
Could you please respond to the comments made by Roger and Sc
+1
Mario
Inviato da iPhone
> Il giorno 14 feb 2020, alle ore 16:01, Antoin Verschuren ha
> scritto:
>
> The following working group document is believed to be ready for submission
> to the IESG for publication as an Informational document:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-reg
> -Original Message-
> From: regext On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren
> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2020 10:01 AM
> To: regext
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-tmch-func-
> spec
>
> The following working group document is believed to be ready for
> submission to
Roger,
Would you be willing to highlight this document and the concern you have
on the ICANN TechOps list? It would be good to see if there are
registry and registrars (albeit gTLDs) that share the concern.
Also a good opportunity to remind folks to join this mailing list to
express their v
Good Afternoon,
As I have mentioned previously, this informational draft has quite a few policy
dependencies built into it that are currently being reviewed and will be
changed by ICANN. The authors have addressed several of these potential policy
issues but there are some that still exist (e
