Re: [reiserfs-list] Quotas working damn well :o)

2001-10-25 Thread Chris Mason
On Thursday, October 25, 2001 08:57:58 AM +0200 Laradji nacer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this patch work with kernel 2.4.10 and redhat ? Untested on 2.4.10, or the redhat 2.4.10. Since you have to rebuild anyway, I'd suggest 2.4.12-ac or a 2.4.13. The README file talks about which patches

Re: [reiserfs-list] ls timing

2001-10-25 Thread Hans Reiser
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: Hi Rutger Swarts wrote: Can you provide description of names and sizes of those files? The files are small (between 1894 and 3682) images that together make up a huge high-detail map. The names look like this: Map.xXX.yYY.gif where

Re: [reiserfs-list] Quotas working damn well :o)

2001-10-25 Thread Chris Mason
On Thursday, October 25, 2001 05:44:48 PM +0400 Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Forgive me for losing track of patches Chris, but are you saying here that a complete quota solution got merged into 2.4.13, and we no longer have to maintain anything separate from the kernel? That would

Re: [reiserfs-list] Disk fragmentation and performance degradation caused by NFS/ preallocation code interaction

2001-10-25 Thread Chris Mason
On Tuesday, October 23, 2001 02:19:57 PM -0400 Anne Milicia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ great analysis of fragmentation problem + fix ] So, my question is can journal_mark_freed() be safely skipped when reiserfs_free_block() is called by __discard_prealloc()? Can you think of any

Re: [reiserfs-list] Disk fragmentation and performance degradation caused by NFS/ preallocation code interaction

2001-10-25 Thread Anne Milicia
Chris Mason wrote: Anyway, Anne, could you please take a look and make sure this still improves your performance? I think the odd results you got for 2.4.12 before were probably due to actual fragmentation against prellocated blocks from other files. With a single writer, 2.4.13 allocates

Re: [reiserfs-list] Disk fragmentation and performance degradation caused by NFS/ preallocation code interaction

2001-10-25 Thread Chris Mason
On Thursday, October 25, 2001 03:06:27 PM -0600 Eric Whiting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is some feedback of 2.4.13+the patch from Chris. Two tests: local fs and NFS. I still see odd things happening at files above 300G. This is reiserfs formatted -v2 (3.6) with a default mount (tail).

[reiserfs-list] reiserfs on linux 2.4.3

2001-10-25 Thread avante avante
I just read you're not supposed to mix reiserfs and linux 2.4.3. Unfortunately I didn't know that until today and that's exactly what I've been doing with Mandrake 8. Nothing unusual has happened so far but does anyone know what could happen and if I should move my files off immediately?

RE: [reiserfs-list] reiserfs on linux 2.4.3

2001-10-25 Thread David R. Bergstein
Dear Avante, You should not need to move your files yet. However, backing up your critical data on a regular basis is strongly advised. Now would be a good time to do this if you have not done so. If its any help, I can say that the two server machines in my home network here (one w/AMD K6