Re: journal size reiserfs vs reiser4

2005-09-04 Thread David Masover
Clemens Eisserer wrote: Well, it sounds a bit like a microsoft manager explaining why XP-Home has no terminal server features ;-) I think an mkfs-option would be best, with a warning if the value given by the user is nonsence (3-8% ok?). Is there a reason we need to specify this at mkfs time?

RE: Sublime Update

2005-09-04 Thread William
Hi, term-life-insurers currentlyOffering bestThings: +Svings up to 7O% +QuicklyQuote Turnaround +SmokersApproved! TakesOnlyMinutes: http://www.lifequotesgalore.com Thanks

Re: journal size reiserfs vs reiser4

2005-09-04 Thread Clemens Eisserer
Well, it sounds a bit like a microsoft manager explaining why XP-Home has no terminal server features ;-) I think an mkfs-option would be best, with a warning if the value given by the user is nonsence (3-8% ok?). On the contrary a 500GB hard drive with normal files on it would not benefit too muc