Belese porno kanallarini izlemek icin
http://www.turk-tv.com
sayfasini ziyaret edin :-)
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 01:29, Laurent Riffard wrote:
> Le 31.07.2006 21:55, Vladimir V. Saveliev a écrit :
> > Hello
> >
> > What kind of load did you run on reiser4 at that time?
>
> I just formatted a new 2GB Reiser4 FS, then I moved a whole ccache
> cache tree to this new FS (cache size was a
On 8/2/06, Krzysztof Halasa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kyle Moffett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> IMHO the best alternative for a situation like that is a storage
> controller with a battery-backed cache and a hunk of flash NVRAM for
> when the power shuts off (just in case you run out of batter
I stress tested this patch for 18hrs on my machine, and it seems stable.
Thanks for the update and warning.
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 23:55 +0400, Alexander Zarochentsev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> reiser4-for-2.6.16-4.patch contains a bug which can cause fs corruption
> (it is the same bug as is in the fir
Hello,
Every few weeks reiser4 panics on me, generally while kmail is
receiving emails. Until recently, the panic was "invalid opcode:
[#1]" (previously reported), but I have some new errors:
The first is:
reiser4 panicked cowardly: reiser4[less(7234)]: set_file_state
(fs/reiser4/plugi
Hello,
reiser4-for-2.6.16-4.patch contains a bug which can cause fs corruption
(it is the same bug as is in the first reiser4 patches for
linux-2.6.17, now fixed).
If you use that buggy patch, please upgrade you kernel and reiser4 code
to 2.6.17/reiser4-for-2.6.17-3 or use new reiser4-for-2.
Dnia Wed, 02 Aug 2006 20:45:07 +0200, Horst H. von Brand
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał:
Vladimir V. Saveliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 17:32 +0200, �ukasz Mierzwa wrote:
> Dnia Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:33:56 +0200, Linus Torvalds
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> napisał:
> > In othe
Vladimir V. Saveliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 17:32 +0200, Åukasz Mierzwa wrote:
> > Dnia Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:33:56 +0200, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > napisaÅ:
> > > In other words, if a filesystem wants to do something fancy, it needs to
> > > do so WITH TH
Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
Kyle Moffett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
IMHO the best alternative for a situation like that is a storage
controller with a battery-backed cache and a hunk of flash NVRAM for
when the power shuts off (just in case you run out of battery), as
well as a separate 1GB batte
Hello,
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 00:39, Craig Shelley wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 02:51 +0300, Jussi Judin wrote:
> > After that I upgraded to Debian patched kernel 2.6.16-14 and to
> > reiser4 patch 2.6.16-4 for that kernel and ran fsck.reiser4. Then I
> > got errors like this in kern.log af
Kyle Moffett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> IMHO the best alternative for a situation like that is a storage
> controller with a battery-backed cache and a hunk of flash NVRAM for
> when the power shuts off (just in case you run out of battery), as
> well as a separate 1GB battery-backed PCI ramdis
--- Edward Shishkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ricardo (Tru64 User) wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Hello
>
> > I read on reiserfs site, faq #1, about max file
> sizes:
> > max file size 2^60 - bytes => 1 Ei,
> > but page cache limits this to 8 Ti on
> architectures
> > with 32 bit int for reiserfs 3.6
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
