On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 22:39:07 +0400
Vladimir V. Saveliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
On Friday 15 September 2006 06:24, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 22:12:54 +0400
Vladimir V. Saveliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, Andrew
reiser4 in 2.6.18-rc6-mm2 has a bug
btw, please be aware that the post-2.6.17 deadlock fixes which went into
generic_file_buffered_write() caused a few problems:
a) Significant NFS overwrite performance regression (due to running
prepare_write/commit_write) against each writev segment.
b) Smaller but significant performance
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 04:34:26 +0400
Alexey Dobriyan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patch below is so-called reiser4 LZO compression plugin as extracted
from 2.6.18-rc4-mm3.
I think it is an unauditable piece of shit and thus should not enter
mainline.
Like lib/inflate.c (and this new code
I can see that the bigalloc code as-is is pretty sad, but this is a scary
patch. It has the potential to cause people significant performance
problems way, way ahead in the future.
For example, suppose userspace is growing two files concurrently. It could
be that the bigalloc code would cause
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:46:34 -0700
Clay Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps I mis-recall, but shouldn't delayed writes (or something along
those lines) cause a case where two files are being incrementally
written rare?
If we did delayed allocation, yes. But we generally don't.
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:24:37 +0400
Vladimir V. Saveliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The writeout code is ugly, although that's largely due to a mismatch
between
what reiser4 wants to do and what the VFS/MM expects it to do.
Yes. reiser4 writeouts atoms. Most of pages get into atoms via
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 12:42:28 -0400
Jeff Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On systems with block devices containing slashes (virtual dasd, cciss,
etc), reiserfs will fail to initialize /proc/fs/reiserfs/dev due to
it being interpreted as a subdirectory. The generic block device code
changes
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 20:51:47 -0700
Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 12:42:28 -0400
Jeff Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On systems with block devices containing slashes (virtual dasd, cciss,
etc), reiserfs will fail to initialize
On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 10:31:49 +0900
Hisashi Hifumi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When write() extends a file(i_size is increased) and fsync() is called,
change of inode must be written to journaling area through fsync().
But,currently the i_trans_id is not correctly updated when i_size
is
Jan Kara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
reiserfs_cache_default_acl() should return whether we successfully found the
acl or not. We have to return correct value even if reiserfs_get_acl() returns
error code and not just 0. Otherwise callers such as reiserfs_mkdir() can
unnecessarily lock the xattrs
Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suspect that when someone did the search and replace when creating
balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr they failed to read the code and
realize this code path was already effectively ratelimited. The result
is they made it excessively infrequent (every
Boy, lots of reiserfs things happening lately.
We presently have:
reiserfs-do-not-check-if-unsigned-0.patch [ merged today ]
reiserfs-fix-transaction-overflowing.patch
reiserfs-handle-trans_id-overflow.patch
Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the this time we have no idea which patch is responsible, probably in
a day or two we'll have a patch to fix it.
OK. I assume this performance change is demonstrable in just
2.6.14-rc2+reiser4? Beware that there are other changes in the -mm lineup
Vladimir V. Saveliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patch titled
reiser4-big-update-div64-fix
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
reiser4-big-update-div64-fix.patch
From: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There's
Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Do I remember right that the submission
deadline is a week from Monday for 2.6.14 inclusion?
Next week, supposedly.
But something like a brand new filesystem can go in pretty much any time,
as long as it compiles. Because it can't break anyone's
Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew, we have been working on a big patch that resolves the VFS
layering issues. This patch should be ready to send in any day now, we
are debugging it. We may not have been sending you a lot of emails, but
we have been working away at it.
That's good
Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew asked me to put together a list of things that need to be done
before merging:
Thanks.
As I said to Hans, if we can get a list of bullet-point actions nailed down
and agreed to then we have an uncontroversial path to happiness and a
merge. Let's
Jeff Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ assert(nikita-955, pool != NULL);
These assertion codes are meaningless to the rest of us so please drop
them.
As someone who spends time debugging reiser3 issues, I've grown
accustomed to the named assertions. They make discussing a
Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is wrong with having an encryption plugin implemented in this
manner? What is wrong with being able to have some files implemented
using a compression plugin, and others in the same filesystem not.
What is wrong with having one file in the FS
Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just an FYI, we are still figuring it out. andrew, you might note it in
release notes, especially if we don't fix it before your next release.
I'd try reverting simplified-readahead*.patch.
Jan Kara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What prevents vfs_quota_off() from racing with unmount?
If you look at, say, sync_filesystems() you'll see that we take -s_umount
and then test -s_root to check that we didn't race with an unmount
attempt.
I thought that the sync_fs and stuff is
Laurent Riffard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch fix a use after kfree bug in reiser4_parse_options.
I'll add that to -mm. In future, please don't allow your email client to
wordwrap patches. Thanks.
Jan Kara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+static ssize_t ext2_quota_read(struct super_block *sb, int type, char *data,
+size_t len, loff_t off)
+{
+ struct inode *inode = sb_dqopt(sb)-files[type];
+ unsigned long blk = off EXT2_BLOCK_SIZE_BITS(sb);
`blk' should
Jan Kara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+static ssize_t ext2_quota_write(struct super_block *sb, int type,
+ const char *data, size_t len, loff_t off)
+{
+ struct inode *inode = sb_dqopt(sb)-files[type];
+ unsigned long blk = off EXT2_BLOCK_SIZE_BITS(sb);
+
Hilzinger Marcel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SuSE Linux 9.2 will contain reiser4
hm. Nobody ever tells me anything. Does that mean that
SuSE are using 8k stacks?
Hey, I was reading that!
Please do *not* go making modifications to Cc: lists. Just do reply-to-all
and be happy, thanks.
Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/experimental/2.6.5-rc2-mm2
Has a new set of reiserfs patches.
-ENODOCCO. If people are going to test this stuff we will need setup and
usage instructions, links to userspace tool upgrades, etc, etc.
Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 17:18, Andrew Morton wrote:
Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/experimental/2.6.5-rc2-mm2
Has a new set of reiserfs patches.
-ENODOCCO. If people are going
Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 17:35, Andrew Morton wrote:
For data=ordered? The only docs are to mount -o data=writeback if you
don't want data=ordered (which is the new default). No tool upgrades
are required.
OK, thanks. Switching the default
Mike Fedyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 06:34:10PM +0200, Diego Calleja Garc?a wrote:
El Wed, 06 Aug 2003 18:06:37 +0400 Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribi?:
I don't think ext2 is a serious option for servers of the sort that
Linux specializes in, which is
Grant Miner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tested the performace of various filesystems with a mozilla build tree
of 295MB, with primarily writing and copying operations. The test
system is Linux 2.6.0-test2, 512MB memory, 11531.85MB partition for
tests. Sync is run a few times throughout
31 matches
Mail list logo
